Evaluation of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases A Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

被引:22
作者
Armbruster, Marco [1 ]
Sourbron, Steven [2 ]
Haug, Alexander [3 ]
Zech, Christoph J. [4 ]
Ingrisch, Michael [1 ]
Auernhammer, Christoph J. [5 ]
Nikolaou, Konstantin [1 ]
Paprottka, Philipp M. [1 ]
Rist, Carsten [1 ]
Reiser, Maximilian F. [1 ]
Sommer, Wieland H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Clin Radiol, Univ Hosp Grosshadern, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Leeds, Div Med Phys, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Munich, Dept Nucl Med, Univ Hosp Grosshadern, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Basel, Dept Clin Radiol, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Univ Munich, Dept Internal Med 2, Interdisciplinary Ctr Neuroendocrine Tumors Gastr, Univ Hosp Grosshadern, D-81377 Munich, Germany
关键词
liver metastases; DCE-MRI; PET/CT; neuroendocrine tumor; HEPATIC METASTASES; BLOOD-FLOW; PERFUSION PARAMETERS; F-18-DOPA PET; CANCER-CELLS; TUMORS; MRI; GA-68-DOTATATE; QUANTIFICATION; MR/PET;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182a4eb4a
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters and specific uptake values (SUVs) derived from (18)fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) and Ga-68-DOTA-Tyr(3)-octreotate (Ga-68-DOTATATE) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with liver metastases of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Methods A total of 42 patients with hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine neoplasms were prospectively enrolled and underwent both dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and PET/CT, using either F-18-FDG or Ga-68-DOTATATE as tracer. The DCE-MRI was performed at 3 T with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid acquiring 48 slices every 2.2 seconds for 5 minutes. Three regions of interest (ROIs) representing the liver background and up to 3 ROIs representing metastatic liver tissue were coregistered in the PET/CT and in the DCE-MRI data sets. For each patient, a dedicated dual-inlet, 2-compartment uptake model was fitted to the enhancement curves of DCE-MRI ROIs and perfusion parameters were calculated. Lesion-to-background ratios of SUVs were correlated with corresponding lesion-to-background ratios of the perfusion parameters arterial plasma flow, venous plasma flow, total plasma flow, extracellular mean transit time, extracellular volume, arterial flow fraction, intracellular uptake rate, and hepatic uptake fraction using the Spearman coefficient. Results Whereas the lesion-to-background ratios of arterial plasma flow and arterial flow fraction of liver metastases correlated negatively with the lesion-to-background ratios of SUVmean derived from Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT (r = -0.54, P < 0.001; r = -0.39, P < 0.001, respectively), they correlated positively with the lesion-to-background ratios of SUVmean derived from F-18-FDG-PET/CT (r = 0.51, P < 0.05; r = 0.68, P < 0.01, respectively). The lesion-to-background ratios of the DCE-MRI parameters extracellular mean transit time and extracellular volume correlated very weakly with the lesion-to-background ratios of SUVmean from Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT, whereas venous plasma flow, total plasma flow, hepatic uptake fraction, and intracellular uptake rate showed no correlation between DCE-MRI and PET/CT. Conclusions Both Ga-68-DOTATATE and (18)fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT partially correlate with MRI perfusion parameters from the dual-inlet, 2-compartment uptake model. The results indicate that the paired imaging methods deliver complementary functional information.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 14
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnosis of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Versus Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Versus Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Muhi, Ali
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Sou, Hironobu
    Nakajima, Hiroto
    Sano, Katsuhiro
    Kitamura, Takatoshi
    Faima, Zareen
    Fukushima, Kimiyo
    Araki, Tsutomu
    Lino, Hiroshi
    Mori, Yoshiyuki
    Fujii, Hideki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 32 (05) : 1132 - 1140
  • [22] Validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Rajasekaran, Sriman
    Venkatesh, K.
    Cherian, Mathew
    Mehta, Pankaj
    Radhakrishnan, Shankar
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 85 : E137 - E143
  • [23] Diagnostic Efficiency of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Pelvic Neoplasms
    Liu, Guan-Yuan
    Li, Xue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2019, 9 (02) : 339 - 344
  • [24] Computed tomography, positron emission tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging of limited pleural mesothelioma - Initial results
    Plathow, Christian
    Staab, Adrian
    Schmaehl, Astrid
    Aschoff, Philip
    Zuna, Ivan
    Pfannenberg, Christina
    Peter, Schlemmer Heinz
    Eschmann, Susanne
    Klopp, Michael
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2008, 43 (10) : 737 - 744
  • [25] Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emmited Tomography/Computed Tomography and Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases from Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Iarovich, Moran Drucker
    Hinzpeter, Ricarda
    Moloney, Brian Michael
    Hueniken, Katrina
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    Ortega, Claudia
    Ur Metser
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01) : 521 - 534
  • [26] The Imaging Performances of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
    Xin, Zhong
    Long, Xiangdang
    Chen, Hongtian
    Hu, Yongjun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2020, 10 (09) : 2192 - 2197
  • [27] Functional Imaging of Colorectal Cancer: Positron Emission Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Computed Tomography
    Kapse, Nikhil
    Goh, Vicky
    [J]. CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2009, 8 (02) : 77 - 87
  • [28] NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT OF TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT USING DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND 18F-FLUOROMISONIDAZOLE POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING IN NECK NODAL METASTASES
    Jansen, Jacobus F. A.
    Schoeder, Heiko
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    Wang, Ya
    Pfister, David. G.
    Fury, Matthew G.
    Stambuk, Hilda E.
    Humm, John L.
    Koutcher, Jason A.
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (05): : 1403 - 1410
  • [29] Discrepancies between positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in a cohort of oncological patients
    Oh, Geon
    O'Mahoney, Eoin
    Jeavons, Susanne
    Law, Phillip
    Ngai, Stanley
    McGill, George
    Yu, Chris
    Miles, Kenneth A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 64 (02) : 204 - 210
  • [30] Comparison of time curves from dynamic F-18-fluciclovine positron emission tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for primary prostate carcinomas
    Tulipan, Andreas Julius
    Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
    Malinen, Eirik
    Brennhovd, Bjorn
    Hole, Knut Hakon
    Lie, Agnes Kathrine
    Ragnum, Harald Bull
    Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth
    Seierstad, Therese
    [J]. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7 : 51 - 57