Improved bone bonding of hydroxyapatite spacers with a high porosity in a quantitative computed tomography-image pixel analysis: A prospective 1-year comparative study of the consecutive cohort undergoing double-door cervical laminoplasty

Laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite (HA) spacers is widely performed in patients with cervical myelopathy. However, spacer dislocation is a critical complication caused by bone absorption and inadequate bone conductivity, and can result in dural damage and restenosis. We thus designed a prospective cohort study to clarify the feasibility of increased porosity HA spacers for double-door laminoplasty by analyzing computed tomography (CT) images. Forty-seven patients underwent cervical laminoplasty. Two different types of CERATITE HA spacer were used, either high porosity (50%) or low porosity (35%). These HA spacers were placed in an alternating manner into the laminae in each patient. In total, 85 high-porosity (50%) HA spacers and 84 low-porosity (35%) HA spacers were implanted. At postoperative 2weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, CT images were obtained. In both groups, the percentage of bone-bonding boundary area of the HA spacer in contact with laminae and bone volume of the spinous process relative to the 2-week value were calculated by a 3D and 2D CT-image pixel analysis. The bone-bonding ratio was significantly higher in high-porosity (50%) than low-porosity (35%) HA spacers at 3 months and thereafter (1 year, 69.3 +/- 27.8% and 49.7 +/- 32.9% respectively, P <.01). The bone volume in both groups significantly decreased with time (1 year, 73.2 +/- 29.8% and 69.0 +/- 30.4% respectively, P <.01), indicating bone absorption. This showed no significant difference between the HA spacers (P = .15) but was higher in high-porosity (50%) than low-porosity (35%) HA spacers throughout the study period. Meanwhile, spacer breakage was found in 4.7% of high-porosity (50%) HA spacers and 1.2% of low-porosity (35%) HA spacers (P = .37). In summary, high-porosity (50%) HA spacers have the advantages of accelerated bone bonding and relatively decelerated bone absorption compared to low-porosity (35%) HA spacers; however, possibly more frequent breakage of HA spacers with a high porosity (50%) requires careful, extended postoperative follow-up.