The stock preferences of domestic versus foreign investors: Evidence from Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors (QFIIs) in China

被引:28
作者
Zou, Liping [1 ]
Tang, Tiantian [1 ]
Li, Xiaoming [1 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Private Bag 102 904, Auckland 0745, New Zealand
关键词
Institutional investors; Foreign investors; Mutual funds; Firm characteristics; Performance; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; EMERGING MARKETS; MUTUAL FUNDS; OWNERSHIP; PERFORMANCE; COUNTRIES; BEHAVIOR; WORLD; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mulfin.2016.11.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Using a unique dataset, this paper investigates the preferences of, and the stock characteristics in, the domestic and foreign institutional holdings in China, for the period from 2003 to 2014. Results indicate that they have similar preferences on certain stock characteristics, but different towards industry allocations. Results also highlight their differences in corporate governance and stock picking patterns. The panel regression suggests that firms with institutional holdings in the previous period perform better in the following period. This phenomenon is stronger for the domestic holdings, indicating that domestic institutional investors have an edge in stock picking skills over foreign institutional investors. We also conclude that the ownership concentration plays a positive role on firm performances. Our results shed extra light on issues related to the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors scheme, which contributes largely to the Chinese financial market reform after 2003. The findings have important implications to academics, practitioners, and particularly to policy makers, which enables China to further enhance its financial market liberalization with the rest of the world. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 28
页数:17
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], OXFORD REV EC POLICY
[2]   Style investing [J].
Barberis, N ;
Shleifer, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 68 (02) :161-199
[3]  
Bardhan PK, 2000, J INST THEOR ECON, V156, P216
[4]   Greener pastures and the impact of dynamic institutional preferences [J].
Bennett, JA ;
Sias, RW ;
Starks, LT .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2003, 16 (04) :1203-1238
[5]   Banks, financial liberalisation and financial crises in emerging markets [J].
Bird, G ;
Rajan, RS .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2001, 24 (07) :889-910
[6]   Pricing deviation, misvaluation comovement, and macroeconomic conditions [J].
Chang, Eric C. ;
Luo, Yan ;
Ren, Jinjuan .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (12) :5285-5299
[7]   Monitoring: Which institutions matter? [J].
Chen, Xia ;
Harford, Jarrad ;
Li, Kai .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 86 (02) :279-305
[8]   Do foreign investors destabilize stock markets? The Korean experience in 1997 [J].
Choe, H ;
Kho, BC ;
Stulz, RM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 54 (02) :227-264
[9]   Does control-ownership divergence impair market liquidity in an emerging market? Evidence from China [J].
Chu, Xiaojun ;
Liu, Qigui ;
Tian, Gary Gang .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2015, 55 (03) :881-910
[10]   Do domestic and foreign fund managers have similar preferences for stock characteristics? A cross-country analysis [J].
Covrig, Vicentiu ;
Lau, Sie Ting ;
Ng, Lilian .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2006, 37 (03) :407-429