GENETIC VARIATION AMONG OIL PALM PARENT GENOTYPES AND THEIR PROGENIES BASED ON MICROSATELLITE MARKERS

被引:0
|
作者
Norziha, A. [1 ]
Rafii, M. Y. [2 ]
Maizura, I. [1 ]
Ghizan, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Kuala Lumpur 50720, Malaysia
[2] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Agr, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
来源
关键词
oil palm; microsatellite markers; genetic distance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Knowledge on genetic distances and relationships among breeding materials has a significant impact oil crop improvement. Molecular markers are being used increasingly to determine the genetic distance between individuals. In this study, microsatellite markers were used to estimate the genetic distances between selected oil palm parent lines. Microsatellite markers are highly reliable, inherited in codominant fashion whereby heterozygtes and homozygotes are distinguishable, easy to score and can be rapidly produced using PCR technology. Nine microsatellite markers were used to screen selected parent palms (15 duras and 4 pisiferas) and their progenies (16 DxP crosses). Data were scored and analysed using the Biosys-1 software to calculate the genetic distance values. A total of 29 polymorphic bands Were generated. The genetic distances between progenies ranged from 0,089 to 0.313. These results indicate that microsatellite markers are powerful tools for Studying genetic relationships among DxP progenies. These markers should be further explored to assist oil palm breeding.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 541
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Genetic Variation within Glycine max (L.) Merrill Genotypes Resistant to Fusariose as Revealed by Microsatellite Markers
    Liubov, Coretchi
    Ecaterina, Bondarenco
    Nicolae, Barbacar
    Galina, Lupascu
    ROMANIAN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL LETTERS, 2012, 17 (03): : 7270 - 7278
  • [42] GENETIC DIVERSITY AMONG SEEDED DATE PALM GENOTYPES USING START CODON TARGETED (SCoT) MARKERS
    Anany, A. H.
    Soliman, Kh. A.
    Abushady, A. M.
    Elhalwagi, A. A. H.
    Thabet, S. G.
    Alqudah, A. M.
    SABRAO JOURNAL OF BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2024, 56 (03): : 929 - 939
  • [43] Microsatellite based genetic variation among the buffalo breed populations in Pakistan
    Hussain, Tanveer
    Babar, Masroor Ellahi
    Ali, Akhtar
    Nadeem, Asif
    Rehman, Zia Ur
    Musthafa, Muneeb M.
    Marikar, Faiz M. M. T.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2017, 61 (04) : 535 - 542
  • [44] Microsatellite and minisatellite markers based DNA fingerprinting and genetic diversity of blast and ufra resistant genotypes
    Latif, M. A.
    Yusop, Mohd Rafii
    Rahman, M. Motiur
    Talukdar, M. R. Bashar
    COMPTES RENDUS BIOLOGIES, 2011, 334 (04) : 282 - 289
  • [45] Microsatellite markers based genetic diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
    Kapadia, Dhara A.
    Gajera, H. P.
    Madariya, R. B.
    Golakiya, B. A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 17 (02): : 337 - 345
  • [46] Genic microsatellite markers for genetic diversity of rust resistant wheat genotypes
    Sehgal, Sheikh Arslan
    Tahir, Rana Adnan
    Nawaz, Muhammad
    Younas, Muhammad
    JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 4 (01) : 480 - 484
  • [47] Genetic diversity of sugar beet genotypes evaluated by microsatellite DNA markers
    Srivastava, S.
    Pathak, A. D.
    Kumar, R.
    Joshi, B. B.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 38 (05): : 777 - 783
  • [48] Molecular assessment of genetic divergence in pea genotypes using microsatellite markers
    Prakash, Nilmani
    Kumar, Rajeev
    Choudhary, V. K.
    Singh, Chandra Mohan
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2016, 39 (02) : 183 - 188
  • [49] Genetic variation analysis within and among Chinese indigenous swine populations using microsatellite markers
    Fan, B
    Wang, ZG
    Li, YJ
    Zhao, XL
    Liu, B
    Zhao, SH
    Yu, M
    Li, MH
    Chen, SL
    Xiong, TA
    Li, K
    ANIMAL GENETICS, 2002, 33 (06) : 422 - 427
  • [50] Genetic variation within and among three Indian breeds of goat using heterologous microsatellite markers
    Ganai, NA
    Yadav, BR
    ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, 12 (02) : 121 - 136