Multiple comparisons of k binomial proportions

被引:4
作者
Nashimoto, Kane [1 ]
Haldeman, Kristin M. [2 ]
Tait, Christopher M. [3 ]
机构
[1] James Madison Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Dept Math & Stat, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA
[3] Hampden Sydney Coll, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Hampden Sydney, VA 23943 USA
关键词
Analysis of variance; Binomial proportions; Familywise error; Multiple comparisons; Simultaneous inference; SIMPLY ORDERED MEANS; INTERVAL ESTIMATION; DETECTING DIFFERENCES; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; DIFFERENCE; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.csda.2013.07.002
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Comparisons of k independent binomial proportions are studied. Piegorsch (1991) compared the Studentized-range implementation of the Wald interval and the Bonferroni-adjusted interval, both of which performed poorly for small values of the true proportions. Agresti et al. (2008) showed that adding one pseudo observation of each type in forming the Wald interval, along with the Studentized-range implementation, greatly improved the performance. A new two-stage method of multiple comparisons (global test followed by pairwise tests) is proposed. For the pairwise tests, three procedures are proposed, which are the LSD type, modified LSD, and inverse-sine based. Simulation studies show that the new procedures have relatively high power and that the modified LSD and inverse-sine based procedures maintain the familywise error rate near the nominal level. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 212
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Simple and effective confidence intervals for proportions and differences of proportions result from adding two successes and two failures [J].
Agresti, A ;
Caffo, B .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2000, 54 (04) :280-288
[2]   Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions [J].
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1998, 52 (02) :119-126
[3]   Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Comparing Binomial Parameters [J].
Agresti, Alan ;
Bini, Matilde ;
Bertaccini, Bruno ;
Ryu, Euijung .
BIOMETRICS, 2008, 64 (04) :1270-1275
[4]  
[Anonymous], J AM STAT ASS
[5]   THE TRANSFORMATION OF POISSON, BINOMIAL AND NEGATIVE-BINOMIAL DATA [J].
ANSCOMBE, FJ .
BIOMETRIKA, 1948, 35 (3-4) :246-254
[6]   Interval estimation for a binomial proportion - Comment - Rejoinder [J].
Brown, LD ;
Cai, TT ;
DasGupta, A ;
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA ;
Casella, G ;
Corcoran, C ;
Mehta, C ;
Ghosh, M ;
Santner, TJ ;
Brown, LD ;
Cai, TT ;
DasGupta, A .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 16 (02) :101-133
[7]   The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. [J].
Clopper, CJ ;
Pearson, ES .
BIOMETRIKA, 1934, 26 :404-413
[8]   TRANSFORMATIONS RELATED TO THE ANGULAR AND THE SQUARE ROOT [J].
FREEMAN, MF ;
TUKEY, JW .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1950, 21 (04) :607-611
[9]   EXTENSION OF MULTIPLE RANGE TESTS TO GROUP MEANS WITH UNEQUAL NUMBERS OF REPLICATIONS [J].
KRAMER, CY .
BIOMETRICS, 1956, 12 (03) :307-310
[10]   A note on multiple comparison procedures for detecting differences in simply ordered means [J].
Nashimoto, K ;
Wright, FT .
STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2005, 73 (04) :393-401