Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a 5-year prospective follow-up study

被引:44
|
作者
Jacquetin, B. [1 ,11 ]
Hinoul, P. [2 ]
Gauld, J. [3 ]
Fatton, B. [1 ]
Rosenthal, C. [4 ]
Clave, H. [5 ]
Garbin, O. [6 ]
Berrocal, J. [7 ]
Villet, R. [8 ]
Salet-Lizee, D. [8 ]
Debodinance, P. [9 ]
Cosson, M. [10 ]
机构
[1] Estaing Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, F-63003 Clermont Ferrand 1, France
[2] Ethicon, Med Affairs, Somerville, NJ USA
[3] Ethicon, Clin Dev, Livingston, Scotland
[4] St Germain Private Hosp, Dept Gynaecol, Brive La Gaillarde, France
[5] St George Private Clin, Dept Gynaecol, Nice, France
[6] SIHCUS CMCO Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Strasbourg, France
[7] LEurope Private Clin, Dept Gynaecol, Rouen, France
[8] Diaconesses Hosp, Dept Gynaecol, Paris, France
[9] Gen Hosp Dunkerque, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Dunkerque, France
[10] Jeanne de Flandre Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Lille, France
[11] Estaing Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynaecol Human Reprod, F-63003 Clermont Ferrand 1, France
关键词
Mesh; Pelvic organ prolapse; Polypropylene; Prolift; Transvaginal mesh; Vaginal surgery; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; POLYPROPYLENE MESH; SUPPORT DEFECTS; SEXUAL FUNCTION; VAGINAL REPAIR; COLPORRHAPHY; REOPERATION; COLLAGEN; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-013-2080-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
To evaluate clinical effectiveness and complication rates at 5 years following the total Trans Vaginal Mesh (TVM) technique to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Prospective, observational, multi-centre study in patients with prolapse of stage II or higher. Of the 90 women enrolled in the study, 82 (91 %) were available for the 5-year follow-up period. At the 5-year endpoint, success, defined as no surgical prolapse reintervention and leading edge <-1 (International Continence Society [ICS] criteria) or above the level of the hymen, was 79 % and 87 % respectively. A composite criterion of success defined as: leading edge above the hymen (< 0) and no bulge symptoms and no reintervention for prolapse was met by 90 %, 88 % and 84 % at the 1-, 3-, and 5-year endpoints respectively. Quality of life improvement was sustained over the 5 years. Over the 5-year follow-up period, a total of only 4 patients (5 %) required re-intervention for prolapse, while a total of 14 patients (16 %) experienced mesh exposure for which 8 resections needed to be performed. Seven exposures were still ongoing at the 5-year endpoint, all asymptomatic. Only 33 out of 61 (54 %) sexually active patients at baseline remained so at 5 years. De novo dyspareunia was reported by 10 %, but no new cases at the 5-year endpoint. One patient reported de novo unprovoked mild pelvic pain at 5 years, 5 reported pains during pelvic examination only. Five-year results indicated that TVM provided a stable anatomical repair. Improvements in QOL and associated improvements in prolapse-specific symptoms were sustained. Minimal new morbidity emerged between the 1- and 5-year follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:1679 / 1686
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prospective Follow-Up of Female Sexual Function after Vaginal Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Transobturator Mesh Implants
    Hoda, M. R.
    Wagner, Sigrid
    Greco, Francesco
    Heynemann, Hans
    Fornara, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (03) : 914 - 922
  • [22] Sexual and functional outcomes after prolapse surgery: a randomized prospective comparison of trocarless transvaginal mesh and pelvic organ prolapse suspension
    Fuschi, Andrea
    Martoccia, Alessia
    Al Salhi, Yazan
    Maggi, Martina
    Capone, Lorenzo
    Suraci, Paolo Pietro
    Antonioni, Alice
    Bozzini, Giorgio
    Illiano, Ester
    Costantini, Elisabetta
    Zucchi, Alessandro
    Cervigni, Mauro
    Carbone, Antonio
    Pastore, Antonio Luigi
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (04) : 1693 - 1700
  • [23] Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of pelvic organ prolapse treatment with the use of polypropylene mesh depending on mesh and application technique
    Banach, Renata
    Antosiak, Beata
    Blewniewska, Gratyna
    Malinowski, Andrzej
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2013, 84 (07) : 596 - 602
  • [24] Three-year outcome of transvaginal mesh repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
    Long, Cheng-Yu
    Hsu, Chun-Shuo
    Wu, Chin-Hu
    Liu, Cheng-Min
    Wang, Chiu-Lin
    Tsai, Eing-Mei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2012, 161 (01) : 105 - 108
  • [25] Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors
    Collinet, Pierre
    Belot, Franck
    Debodinance, Philippe
    Duc, Edouard Ha
    Lucot, Jean-Philippe
    Cosson, Michel
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2006, 17 (04) : 315 - 320
  • [26] Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors
    Pierre Collinet
    Franck Belot
    Philippe Debodinance
    Edouard Ha Duc
    Jean-Philippe Lucot
    Michel Cosson
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2006, 17 : 315 - 320
  • [27] A prospective study of pessary use for severe pelvic organ prolapse: 3-year follow-up outcomes
    Bin Li
    Qiaohua Chen
    Jing Zhang
    Cuige Yu
    Lu Zhang
    Lihong Chen
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2020, 301 : 1213 - 1218
  • [28] Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Prolift Transvaginal Mesh for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Song, Wan
    Kim, Tae Heon
    Chung, Jin Woo
    Cho, Won Jin
    Lee, Ha Na
    Lee, Young Suk
    Lee, Kyu-Sung
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2016, 8 (03) : 159 - 164
  • [29] Transvaginal Mesh Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by the Transobturator-Infracoccygeal Hammock Technique: Long-Term Anatomical and Functional Outcomes
    Sergent, Fabrice
    Resch, Benoit
    Al-Khattabi, Maysoon
    Ricbourg, Aude
    Schaal, Jean-Patrick
    Marpeau, Loic
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2011, 30 (03) : 384 - 389
  • [30] Transvaginal Mesh Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: One-Year Outcome Analysis
    Khandwala, Salil
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2019, 35 (01) : 12 - 18