Does Rebound Tonometry Probe Misalignment Modify Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Human Eyes?

被引:16
|
作者
Beasley, Ian G. [1 ]
Laughton, Deborah S. [1 ]
Coldrick, Benjamin J. [2 ]
Drew, Thomas E. [2 ]
Sallah, Marium [1 ]
Davies, Leon N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Ophthalm Res Grp, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
[2] Aston Univ, Biomed Engn Res Grp, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
关键词
GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER; ICARE; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1155/2013/791084
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To examine the influence of positional misalignments on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with a rebound tonometer. Methods. Using the iCare rebound tonometer, IOP readings were taken from the right eye of 36 healthy subjects at the central corneal apex (CC) and compared to IOPmeasures using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). Using a bespoke rig, iCare IOP readings were also taken 2 mm laterally from CC, both nasally and temporally, along with angular deviations of 5 and 10 degrees, both nasally and temporally to the visual axis. Results. Mean IOP +/- SD, asmeasured byGAT, was 14.7 +/- 2.5 mmHg versus iCare tonometer readings of 17.4 +/- 3.6mmHg at CC, representing an iCare IOP overestimation of 2.7 +/- 2.8mm Hg (P < 0.001), which increased at higher average IOPs. IOP at CC using the iCare tonometer was not significantly different to values at lateral displacements. IOP wasmarginally underestimated with angular deviation of the probe but only reaching significance at 10 degrees nasally. Conclusions. As shown previously, the iCare tonometer overestimates IOP compared to GAT. However, IOP measurement in normal, healthy subjects using the iCare rebound tonometer appears insensitive to misalignments. An IOP underestimation of < 1mmHg with the probe deviated 10 degrees nasally reached statistical but not clinical significance levels.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the Reliability of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Rebound Tonometry
    Realini, Tony
    McMillan, Brian
    Gross, Ronald L.
    Devience, Eva
    Balasubramani, Goundappa K.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2021, 30 (08) : 629 - 633
  • [2] Rebound tonometry versus Goldmann tonometry in school children: feasibility and agreement of intraocular pressure measurements
    Barranco Esporcatte, Bruno Leonardo
    Santos Lopes, Flÿvio Siqueira
    Netto, Camila Fonseca
    Reboucas-Santos, Vespasiano
    Dias, Diego Torres
    Marujo, Fabio Iglesias
    Rolim-de-Moura, Christiane
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2015, 78 (06) : 359 - 362
  • [3] Clinical differences in rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements of intraocular pressure in adult patients
    Chiu, Zelia
    Collins, Camille
    van der Straaten, David
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 50 (08): : 923 - 924
  • [4] Agreement of rebound and applanation tonometry intraocular pressure measurements during atmospheric pressure change
    Vercellin, Alice Verticchio
    Harris, Alon
    Siesky, Brent
    Zukerman, Ryan
    Tanga, Lucia
    Carnevale, Carmela
    Scarinci, Fabio
    Oddone, Francesco
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [5] Validation of rebound tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement in the rabbit
    Zhang, Hong
    Yang, Dong
    Ross, Craig M.
    Wigg, Jonathan P.
    Pandav, Surinder
    Crowston, Jonathan G.
    EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH, 2014, 121 : 86 - 93
  • [6] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children
    Vodencarevic, Amra Nadarevic
    Jusufovic, Vahid
    Terzic, Svjetlana
    Halilbasic, Meliha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 163 : 192 - 192
  • [7] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children
    Feng, Chi Shian
    Jin, Ki Won
    Yi, Kayoung
    Choi, Dong Gyu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 160 (05) : 937 - 943
  • [8] Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Rebound Tonometry in Eight Different Species of Companion Birds
    Karimi, Vahid
    Asadi, Faezeh
    Rajaei, Seyed Mehdi
    Golabdar, Salar
    JOURNAL OF AVIAN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 34 (04) : 338 - 342
  • [9] Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
    Shemesh, Gabi
    Soiberman, Uri
    Kurtz, Shimon
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 6 : 1967 - 1970
  • [10] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements in healthy subjects taken by rebound tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry and applanation tonometry at a hospital in Mexico City
    Perez Gudino, Itzel Montserrat
    Escalante-Castanon, Mariana
    Hernandez-Oteyza, Alejandra
    Jimenez-Arroyo, Jesus
    Garcia-Huerta, Magdalena
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)