A machine learning approach using EEG data to predict response to SSRI treatment for major depressive disorder

被引:93
作者
Khodayari-Rostamabad, Ahmad [1 ,3 ]
Reilly, James P. [1 ]
Hasey, Gary M. [2 ,3 ]
de Bruin, Hubert [1 ]
MacCrimmon, Duncan J. [2 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[3] St Josephs Healthcare, Mood Disorders Program, Mt Hlth Serv, Hamilton, ON L8N 3K7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Prediction; Machine learning; Mood disorders; Major depressive disorder; EEG; Antidepressants; Personalized medicine; Biomarkers; STAR-ASTERISK-D; ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT; SYMPTOMATIC RESPONSE; MUTUAL INFORMATION; ERROR ESTIMATION; NEURAL-NETWORK; OUTCOMES; CONNECTIVITY; COHERENCE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The problem of identifying, in advance, the most effective treatment agent for various psychiatric conditions remains an elusive goal. To address this challenge, we investigate the performance of the proposed machine learning (ML) methodology (based on the pre-treatment electroencephalogram (EEG)) for prediction of response to treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medication in subjects suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: A relatively small number of most discriminating features are selected from a large group of candidate features extracted from the subject's pre-treatment EEG, using a machine learning procedure for feature selection. The selected features are fed into a classifier, which was realized as a mixture of factor analysis (MFA) model, whose output is the predicted response in the form of a likelihood value. This likelihood indicates the extent to which the subject belongs to the responder vs. non-responder classes. The overall method was evaluated using a "leave-n-out'' randomized permutation cross-validation procedure. Results: A list of discriminating EEG biomarkers (features) was found. The specificity of the proposed method is 80.9% while sensitivity is 94.9%, for an overall prediction accuracy of 87.9%. There is a 98.76% confidence that the estimated prediction rate is within the interval [75%, 100%]. Conclusions: These results indicate that the proposed ML method holds considerable promise in predicting the efficacy of SSRI antidepressant therapy for MDD, based on a simple and cost-effective pre-treatment EEG. Significance: The proposed approach offers the potential to improve the treatment of major depression and to reduce health care costs. (C) 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1975 / 1985
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [61] Revicki DA, 1998, J FAM PRACTICE, V47, P446
  • [62] Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: A STAR*D report
    Rush, A. John
    Trivedi, Madhukar H.
    Wisniewski, Stephen R.
    Nierenberg, Andrew A.
    Stewart, Jonathan W.
    Warden, Diane
    Niederehe, George
    Thase, Michael E.
    Lavori, Philip W.
    Lebowitz, Barry D.
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Rosenbaum, Jerrold F.
    Sackeim, Harold A.
    Kupfer, David J.
    Luther, James
    Fava, Maurizio
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163 (11) : 1905 - 1917
  • [63] STAR*D: Revising conventional wisdom
    Rush J.A.
    Warden D.
    Wisniewski S.R.
    Fava M.
    Trivedi M.H.
    Gaynes B.N.
    Nierenberg A.A.
    [J]. CNS Drugs, 2009, 23 (8) : 627 - 647
  • [64] Clinical prediction of antidepressant response in mood disorders: Linear multivariate vs. neural network models
    Serretti, Alessandro
    Olgiati, Paolo
    Liebman, Michael N.
    Hu, Hai
    Zhang, Yonghong
    Zanardi, Raffaella
    Colombo, Cristina
    Smeraldi, Enrico
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2007, 152 (2-3) : 223 - 231
  • [65] Recovery from depression predicts lower health services costs
    Simon, Gregory E.
    Khandker, Rezaul K.
    Ichikawa, Laura
    Operskalski, Belinda H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 67 (08) : 1226 - 1231
  • [66] An investigation of EEG, genetic and cognitive markers of treatment response to antidepressant medication in patients with major depressive disorder: A pilot study
    Spronk, D.
    Arns, M.
    Barnett, K. J.
    Cooper, N. J.
    Gordon, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2011, 128 (1-2) : 41 - 48
  • [67] Suffin S.C., 2007, J AM PHYS SURG, V12, P104
  • [68] Current Source Density Measures of Electroencephalographic Alpha Predict Antidepressant Treatment Response
    Tenke, Craig E.
    Kayser, Juergen
    Manna, Carlye G.
    Fekri, Shiva
    Kroppmann, Christopher J.
    Schaller, Jennifer D.
    Alschuler, Daniel M.
    Stewart, Jonathan W.
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Bruder, Gerard E.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 70 (04) : 388 - 394
  • [69] Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: Implications for clinical practice
    Trivedi, MH
    Rush, AJ
    Wisniewski, SR
    Nierenberg, AA
    Warden, D
    Ritz, L
    Norquist, G
    Howland, RH
    Lebowitz, B
    McGrath, PJ
    Shores-Wilson, K
    Biggs, MM
    Balasubramani, GK
    Fava, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163 (01) : 28 - 40
  • [70] ACUTE VS CHRONIC EEG EFFECTS IN MAPROTILINE-TREATED AND IN CLOMIPRAMINE-TREATED DEPRESSIVE INPATIENTS AND THE PREDICTION OF THERAPEUTIC OUTCOME
    ULRICH, G
    HAUG, HJ
    FAHNDRICH, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1994, 32 (03) : 213 - 217