Diagnostic accuracy of liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2014 for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinomas in patients with chronic liver disease on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

被引:64
作者
Joo, Ijin [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Sang Min [1 ]
Lee, Jeong Sub [1 ]
Park, Jin Young [1 ]
Han, Joon Koo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
LI-RADS; intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma; portal venous phase; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; PATHOLOGICAL CONCEPTS; HEPATOBILIARY AGENTS; CLASSIFICATION; ALLOCATION; CIRRHOSIS; PATTERN; CT;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25287
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo investigate the utility of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2014 for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinomas (IMCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board with waiver of informed consent. Pathologically confirmed IMCCs (n = 35) and hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) (n = 71) in patients with chronic hepatitis B or cirrhosis who had undergone gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0T or 1.5T MRI were included. Three radiologists independently assigned LI-RADS categories for each IMCC or HCC. Diagnostic performances of LR-M (probable malignancy, not specific for HCC) and LR-5/5v (definitely HCC) were investigated, and imaging features were compared between IMCCs of LR-M and non-LR-M. ResultsIn all, 88.6% (31/35), 80.0% (28/35), and 74.3% (26/35) of IMCCs and 12.7% (9/71), 22.5% (16/71), and 16.9% (12/71) of HCCs were assigned as LR-M by the three reviewers with substantial interobserver agreements (kappa = 0.664-0.741). Among IMCCs, 2.9% (1/35), 5.7% (2/35), and 11.4% (4/35) were categorized as LR-5/5v. IMCCs of non-LR-M (n = 8, using the consensus method) were significantly smaller (24.1 17.4 vs. 62.8 +/- 30.6 mm, P = 0.002) and showed higher frequencies of arterial hyperenhancement (75.0% (6/8) vs. 7.4% (2/27), P < 0.001) and lower frequencies of non-HCC malignancy-favoring features such as peripheral enhancement (12.5% (1/8) vs. 77.8% (21/27), P = 0.002) or the target appearance on the hepatobiliary phase (0% (0/8) vs. 81.5% (22/27), P < 0.001) than IMCCs of LR-M (n = 27). ConclusionUsing LI-RADS, the majority of IMCCs can be accurately categorized as LR-M on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI; however, caution is warranted, as some atypical IMCCs may be assigned as LR-5/5v resulting in a false-positive diagnosis of HCC. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1330-1338.
引用
收藏
页码:1330 / 1338
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 ancillary features to upgrade from LR-4 to LR-5 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI [J].
Lee, Sunyoung ;
Kim, Seung-seob ;
Bae, Heejin ;
Shin, Jaeseung ;
Yoon, Ja Kyung ;
Kim, Myeong-Jin .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) :855-863
[42]   Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018: differential diagnostic value of ADC values for benign and malignant nodules with moderate probability (LR-3) [J].
Chen, Xue ;
Cai, Quanyu ;
Xia, Jinju ;
Huang, Huan ;
Li, Zhaoxing ;
Song, Kairong ;
Jia, Ningyang ;
Liu, Wanmin .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
[43]   Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) 2017 - a review of important differences compared to the CT/MRI system [J].
Kim, Tae Kyoung ;
Noh, Seung Yeon ;
Wilson, Stephanie R. ;
Kono, Yuko ;
Piscaglia, Fabio ;
Jang, Hyun-Jung ;
Lyshchik, Andrej ;
Dietrich, Christoph F. ;
Willmann, Juergen K. ;
Vezeridis, Alexander ;
Sirlin, Claude B. .
CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 23 (04) :280-289
[44]   Tumor in vein (LR-TIV) and liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: diagnostic features, pitfalls, prognostic and management implications [J].
Catania, Roberta ;
Chupetlovska, Kalina ;
Borhani, Amir A. ;
Maheshwari, Ekta ;
Furlan, Alessandro .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (12) :5723-5734
[45]   Heterogeneity of non-cancerous liver parenchyma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: an imaging biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma development in chronic liver disease [J].
Asayama, Y. ;
Nishie, A. ;
Ishigami, K. ;
Ushijima, Y. ;
Takayama, Y. ;
Okamoto, D. ;
Fujita, N. ;
Morita, K. ;
Obara, M. ;
Honda, H. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 71 (05) :432-437
[46]   Tumor in vein (LR-TIV) and liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: diagnostic features, pitfalls, prognostic and management implications [J].
Roberta Catania ;
Kalina Chupetlovska ;
Amir A. Borhani ;
Ekta Maheshwari ;
Alessandro Furlan .
Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 :5723-5734
[47]   A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based multivariable model using LI-RADS v2018 and other imaging features for preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Liang, Yingying ;
Xu, Fan ;
Wang, Zihua ;
Tan, Caihong ;
Zhang, Nianru ;
Wei, Xinhua ;
Jiang, Xinqing ;
Wu, Hongzhen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 153
[48]   Diagnostic Performance of 2018 KLCA-NCC Practice Guideline for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B or Cirrhosis: Comparison with LI-RADS Version 2018 [J].
Lee, Sang Min ;
Lee, Jeong Min ;
Ahn, Su Joa ;
Kang, Hyo-Jin ;
Yang, Hyun Kyung ;
Yoon, Jeong Hee .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (07) :1066-1076
[49]   Is Liver-Specific Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Reliable Tool for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease? [J].
Lian-Ming Wu ;
Jian-Rong Xu ;
Hai-Yan Gu ;
Jia Hua ;
Jie Chen ;
Jiong Zhu ;
Wei Zhang ;
Jiani Hu .
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2013, 58 :3313-3325
[50]   Is Liver-Specific Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Reliable Tool for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease? [J].
Wu, Lian-Ming ;
Xu, Jian-Rong ;
Gu, Hai-Yan ;
Hua, Jia ;
Chen, Jie ;
Zhu, Jiong ;
Zhang, Wei ;
Hu, Jiani .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2013, 58 (11) :3313-3325