Divergent stakeholder views of corporate social responsibility in the Australian forest plantation sector

被引:34
作者
Gordon, Melissa [1 ,5 ]
Lockwood, Michael [1 ]
Vanclay, Frank [2 ]
Hanson, Dallas [3 ]
Schirmer, Jacki [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Geog & Environm Studies, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Cultural Geog, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Tasmania, Fac Business, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[4] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[5] Cooperat Res Ctr Forestry, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Sustainable forest management; Community engagement; Forest certification; COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT; CSR; CERTIFICATION; LEGITIMACY; FRAMEWORK; SUSTAINABILITY; PERSPECTIVES; PERCEPTIONS; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although the Australian forest plantation industry acknowledges that there is a role for corporate social responsibility (CSR) in forest management, there is confusion as to what this constitutes in practice. This paper describes the conflicts between internal and external stakeholder views on CSR in plantation forestry. We conducted in-depth interviews with key informants across three plantation management regions in Australia: Tasmania, the Green Triangle and south-west Western Australia. We interviewed a range of stakeholders including forest company employees, local councils, Indigenous representatives, and environmental non-government organisations. CSR-related initiatives that stakeholders believed were important for plantation management included the need for community engagement, accountability towards stakeholders, and contribution to community development and well-being. Although there was wide support for these initiatives, some stakeholders were not satisfied that forest companies were actively implementing them. Due to the perception that forest companies are not committed to CSR initiatives such as community engagement, some stakeholder expectations are not being satisfied. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 398
页数:9
相关论文
共 83 条
[61]  
Prosser I.P., 2009, WATER HLTH COUNTRY N
[62]   Forest certification - an instrument to promote sustainable forest management? [J].
Rametsteiner, E ;
Simula, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2003, 67 (01) :87-98
[63]   Value positions based on forest policy stakeholders' rhetoric in Finland [J].
Rantala, T ;
Primmer, E .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2003, 6 (03) :205-216
[64]   Guess who's (not) coming for dinner: Expanding the terms of public involvement in sustainable forest management [J].
Reed, Maureen G. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2010, 25 :45-54
[65]  
Richardson A., 2010, INNOVATION
[66]   Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focussed stakeholder management [J].
Roloff, Julia .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2008, 82 (01) :233-250
[67]  
Rowley TJ, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P204
[68]   Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences [J].
Rowley, TJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1997, 22 (04) :887-910
[69]   The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy [J].
Scherer, Andreas Georg ;
Palazzo, Guido .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2011, 48 (04) :899-931