Dosimetric comparison of whole breast radiotherapy using field in field and conformal radiotherapy techniques in early stage breast cancer

被引:0
作者
Yavas, G. [1 ]
Yavas, C. [2 ]
Acar, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Selcuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Konya, Turkey
[2] Konya Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Konya, Turkey
来源
IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH | 2012年 / 10卷 / 3-4期
关键词
Breast cancer; conformal radiotherapy; dose volume histograms; field-in-field technique; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; CONTRALATERAL BREAST; BOOST; CARCINOMAS; THERAPY; TRIALS; IMRT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: We aimed to compare field-in-field technique (FIF) with conformal tangential field radiotherapy (CRT) in terms of dosimetric benefits for early stage breast cancer radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Twenty consecutive left-side breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery were included to the study. For each patient, two different treatment plans were created for the entire breast. FIF plans and CRT plans were compared for doses in the planning target volume (PTV), the organ at risk (OAR) volume including ipsilateral lung, heart, left ascending coronary artery (LAD) and the contralateral breast, the homogeneity index (HI), and the monitor unit (MU) counts required for the treatment. Paired samples t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results: The FIF technique significantly reduced the maximum dose of the PTV as well as the mean doses of the heart, LAD, ipsilateral lung and the contralateral breast (p values were <0.001 for each). When the OAR volumes irradiated with 2, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 Gy were compared, the results were in favor of the FT technique. The volume receiving <20 Gy of the prescription dose for the ipsilateral lung was significantly decreased using FIF technique (p<0.001). FIF technique allowed us more homogenous dose distribution with lower MUs. Conclusion: The FIF technique provided better dose distribution in the PTV and significantly reduced the doses in the OAR. Considering the lower MUs required for treatment the FIF technique seems to be more advantageous than CRT during whole breast irradiation. Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2012; 10(3-4): 131-138
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 138
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
  • [2] A randomised controlled trial of forward-planned radiotherapy (IMRT) for early breast cancer: Baseline characteristics and dosimetry results
    Barnett, Gillian C.
    Wilkinson, Jennifer
    Moody, Anne M.
    Wilson, Charles B.
    Sharma, Ravi
    Klager, Sabine
    Hoole, Andrew C. F.
    Twyman, Nicola
    Burnet, Neil G.
    Coles, Charlotte E.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [3] Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer:: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial
    Bartelink, Harry
    Horiot, Jean-Claude
    Poortmans, Philip M.
    Struikmans, Henk
    Van den Bogaert, Walter
    Fourquet, Alain
    Jager, Jos J.
    Hoogenraad, Willem J.
    Oei, S. Bing
    Warlam-Rodenhuis, Carla C.
    Pierart, Marianne
    Collette, Laurence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (22) : 3259 - 3265
  • [4] Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation
    Bhatnagar, AK
    Brandner, E
    Sonnik, D
    Wu, A
    Kalnicki, S
    Deutsch, M
    Heron, DE
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 96 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [5] CAUSE-SPECIFIC MORTALITY IN LONG-TERM SURVIVORS OF BREAST-CANCER WHO PARTICIPATED IN TRIALS OF RADIOTHERAPY
    CUZICK, J
    STEWART, H
    RUTQVIST, L
    HOUGHTON, J
    EDWARDS, R
    REDMOND, C
    PETO, R
    BAUM, M
    FISHER, B
    HOST, H
    LYTHGOE, J
    RIBEIRO, G
    SCHEURLEN, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (03) : 447 - 453
  • [6] Evaluation of compensation in breast radiotherapy: A planning study using multiple static fields
    Donovan, EM
    Johnson, U
    Shentall, G
    Evans, PM
    Neal, AJ
    Yarnold, JR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (03): : 671 - 679
  • [7] Dosimetric comparison of field in field intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique with conformal radiotherapy techniques in breast cancer
    Ercan, Tuelay
    Igdem, Sefik
    Alco, Guel
    Zengin, Funda
    Atilla, Selin
    Dincer, Maktav
    Okkan, Sait
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 28 (04) : 283 - 289
  • [8] Large breast size as a risk factor for late adverse effects of breast radiotherapy: Is residual dose inhomogeneity, despite 3D treatment planning and delivery, the main explanation?
    Goldsmith, Christy
    Haviland, Joanne
    Tsang, Yat
    Sydenham, Mark
    Yarnold, John
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 100 (02) : 236 - 240
  • [9] A comprehensive clinical 3-dimensional dosimetric analysis of forward planned IMRT and conventional wedge planned techniques for intact breast radiotherapy
    Herrick, Joseph S.
    Neill, Cory J.
    Rosser, Peter F.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2008, 33 (01) : 62 - 70
  • [10] HOLLAND R, 1985, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V56, P979, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<979::AID-CNCR2820560502>3.0.CO