Iobitridol 300 compared to iopromide 300 - A double-blind randomized phase-III study of clinical tolerance in total body CT

被引:0
|
作者
Hoogewoud, HM [1 ]
Woessmer, B [1 ]
机构
[1] LAB GUERBET, AULNAY SOUS BOIS, FRANCE
关键词
contrast media; CT; iobitridol; iopromide; image quality; adverse reactions; comparative study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose, Material and Methods: The clinical safety of iobitridol 300 mg I/ml and iopromide 300 mg I/ml were compared in a randomized double blind phase-III study conducted on 60 patients undergoing abdominal CT for a variety of indications. Each examination was rated as diagnostic or nondiagnostic and the image quality was noted. Nature, onset, intensity as well as outcome of each adverse reaction were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in image quality and side effects be tween the contrast media. In this study, both iobitridol and iopromide provided excellent image qualify and a low rate of side effects. Conclusion: Iobitridol is a safe and effective nonionic contrast agent for contrast-enhanced body CT.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 64
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical experience with iobitridol 250-300 in digital subtraction angiography - Double-blind randomized studies vs iopromide and iohexol
    Bouard, JC
    Lyonnet, D
    Illes, JP
    BouardMonnier, C
    Rouviere, O
    Pangaud, C
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 1996, 37 : 85 - 88
  • [3] COMPARATIVE DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED STUDY OF IOVERSOL 300 VERSUS IOPROMIDE 300 IN ABDOMINAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    HOOGEWOUD, HM
    NEISS, AC
    WOESSMER, B
    ANNALES DE RADIOLOGIE, 1992, 35 (4BIS) : 273 - 275
  • [4] Renal safety in pediatric imaging: randomized, double-blind phase IV clinical trial of iobitridol 300 versus iodixanol 270 in multidetector CT
    Martin Zo’o
    Marcus Hoermann
    Csilla Balassy
    Francis Brunelle
    Robin Azoulay
    Danièle Pariente
    Michel Panuel
    Patrick Le Dosseur
    Pediatric Radiology, 2011, 41 : 1393 - 1400
  • [5] Renal safety in pediatric imaging: randomized, double-blind phase IV clinical trial of iobitridol 300 versus iodixanol 270 in multidetector CT
    Zo'o, Martin
    Hoermann, Marcus
    Balassy, Csilla
    Brunelle, Francis
    Azoulay, Robin
    Pariente, Daniele
    Panuel, Michel
    Le Dosseur, Patrick
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2011, 41 (11) : 1393 - 1400
  • [6] IODIXANOL AND IOXAGLATE IN CARDIOANGIOGRAPHY - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED PHASE-III STUDY
    ANDERSEN, PE
    BOLSTAD, B
    BERG, KJ
    JUSTESEN, P
    THAYSSEN, P
    KLOSTER, YF
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1993, 48 (04) : 268 - 272
  • [7] NEFOPAM AS AN ANALGESIC IN POSTOPERATIVE PAIN - A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, COMPARATIVE, PHASE-III STUDY
    DEWOOLKAR, VV
    JOSHI, MA
    PARULKAR, GB
    MATTOO, V
    BOWALEKAR, SK
    RAGHU, CN
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1991, 50 (06): : 835 - 841
  • [8] IODIXANOL IN FEMORAL ARTERIOGRAPHY (PHASE-III) - A COMPARATIVE DOUBLE-BLIND PARALLEL TRIAL BETWEEN IODIXANOL AND IOPROMIDE
    PUGH, ND
    SISSONS, GRJ
    RUTTLEY, MST
    BERG, KJ
    NOSSEN, JO
    EIDE, H
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1993, 47 (02) : 96 - 99
  • [9] Hepatic and vascular enhancement at dual-phase helical CT: comparison of Iobitridol 300 and Iohexol 300 in a prospective randomized study
    Paul Legmann
    Olivier Vignaux
    Hélène Bahurel
    Joël Coste
    Amar Oudjit
    European Radiology, 2001, 11 : 2220 - 2227
  • [10] IODIXANOL IN FEMORAL ARTERIOGRAPHY - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PHASE-III, PARALLEL STUDY WITH IODIXANOL 270-MG I/ML AND IOHEXOL 300-MG I/ML
    THORSTENSEN, O
    ALBRECHTSSON, U
    CALISSENDORFF, B
    LARUSDOTTIR, H
    NORGREN, L
    TENGVAR, M
    BOLSTAD, B
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 1994, 35 (06) : 629 - 631