The Decision-Making Process of Young Adult Women with Cancer Who Considered Fertility Cryopreservation

被引:56
作者
Hershberger, Patricia E. [1 ,2 ]
Finnegan, Lorna [1 ]
Pierce, Penny F. [3 ]
Scoccia, Bert [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Nursing, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Chicago, IL USA
来源
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING | 2013年 / 42卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
decision research; family planning; fertility preservation; oncofertility; qualitative research; survivorship; theory development; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BREAST-CANCER; PRESERVATION; INFERTILITY; ATTITUDES; SURVIVORS; DISTRESS; COUPLES; IMPACT; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01426.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective To provide an in-depth description of the decision-making process that women who are diagnosed with cancer undergo as they decide whether to accept or decline fertility cryopreservation. Design A qualitative, grounded theory approach. Setting and Participants Twenty-seven women (mean age = 29 years) who were diagnosed with cancer and were eligible for egg, embryo, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation were recruited from the Internet and two university centers. Methods Each woman participated in a semistructured interview by phone (n = 21) or e-mail (n = 6). Data were analyzed using the constant-comparative method to inductively ascertain the women's decision-making process. NVivo 8 software was used to assist with data retrieval and analysis. Results The decision-making process consists of four major phases that women experience to actively formulate a decision: identify, contemplate, resolve, and engage. In the identify phase, women acquire knowledge and experience a double hit scenario that is often devastating. Within the contemplate phase, five interrelated dimensions emerged including constructing and/or endorsing preferences and values and undergoing decisional debriefing sessions. A decision is reached in the resolve phase and carried out in the engage phase. Among the participants, 14 declined fertility cryopreservation and 13 accepted egg and/or embryo cryopreservation. Conclusion The descriptive theoretical framework clarifies the underlying processes that women with cancer undergo to decide about fertility cryopreservation. Quality of care for women with cancer can be improved by implementing appropriately timed information and tailored developmental and contextual counseling to support decision making. JOGNN, 42, 59-69; 2013. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01426.x
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 69
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    AbdelHafez, Faten F.
    Desai, Nina
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    Falcone, Tommaso
    Goldfarb, James
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2010, 20 (02) : 209 - 222
  • [2] Quality of life among younger women with breast cancer
    Avis, NE
    Crawford, S
    Manuel, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (15) : 3322 - 3330
  • [3] Bekker H.L., 2009, Shared decision-making in health care-Achieving evidence-based patient choice, P45
  • [4] Beyond Checking Experiences of the Validation Interview
    Buchbinder, Eli
    [J]. QUALITATIVE SOCIAL WORK, 2011, 10 (01) : 106 - 122
  • [5] Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model
    Charles, C
    Gafni, A
    Whelan, T
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) : 651 - 661
  • [6] Charmaz K., 2006, CONSTRUCTING GROUNDE, DOI DOI 10.7748/NR.13.4.84.S4
  • [7] Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cobo, Ana
    Diaz, Cesar
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (02) : 277 - 285
  • [8] Connell Shirley, 2006, Health Care Women Int, V27, P94, DOI 10.1080/07399330500377580
  • [9] Cowles K V, 1988, West J Nurs Res, V10, P163, DOI 10.1177/019394598801000205
  • [10] Dow K H, 1994, Cancer Pract, V2, P407