Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation

被引:59
作者
Frasnelli, J [1 ]
Heilmann, S [1 ]
Hummel, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Sch Med, Smell & Taste Clin, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
关键词
trigeminal; CO2; mechanosensory; chemosensory; event-related; potentials; intensity; retronasal;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2004.02.059
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
There is evidence that functionally different areas can be distinguished within the nasal mucosa with regard to stimulation site and stimulus properties. The aim of the present study was the comparison of electrophysiological and psychophysical measures obtained in response to mechanical and chemosomatosensory stimulation of two different regions of the nasal mucosa. A total of 40 volunteers participated in this study (age range 21-36 years). Chemosomatosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded using gaseous CO2 as stimulant, while somatosensory ERPs were recorded in response to intranasal mechanical stimuli (air puffs). Stimuli were released to the anterior portion and to the posterior portion of the nasal cavity. A significant interaction between stimulus properties and site of stimulation could be detected after analysis of ERP parameters and intensity ratings. Thus, the chemosensory stimulus was perceived as stronger in the anterior portion of the nasal cavity whereas this was not the case for mechanosensory stimuli. In addition, mechanosensory stimuli were found to evoke ERPs with shorter latencies. These results underline the idea that the respiratory mucosa should not be seen as a homogeneous tissue. It exhibits varying sensitivities to trigeminal stimulation depending on stimulus quality and site of stimulation. Hence, perception of chemosensory stimuli seems to be most accurate in the anterior portion of the nasal cavity, while sensitivity to mechanical stimuli appears to be highest in the posterior portion. In addition, these differences within the respiratory mucosa may contribute to differences in the perception of orthonasal and retronasal odorous stimulation. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 69
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   MEASUREMENT OF FEELINGS USING VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALES [J].
AITKEN, RCB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1969, 62 (10) :989-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen des menschlichen Geruchssinnes
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, HDB OLFACTION GUSTAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY MI
[5]   CONTROLLED NOXIOUS CHEMICAL-STIMULATION - RESPONSES OF RAT TRIGEMINAL BRAIN-STEM NEURONS TO CO2 PULSES APPLIED TO THE NASAL-MUCOSA [J].
ANTON, F ;
PEPPEL, P ;
EUCHNER, I ;
HANDWERKER, HO .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1991, 123 (02) :208-211
[6]   OLFACTORY EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS IN PSYCHOSIS-PRONE SUBJECTS [J].
BECKER, E ;
HUMMEL, T ;
PIEL, E ;
PAULI, E ;
KOBAL, G ;
HAUTZINGER, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 15 (01) :51-58
[7]   INTERACTION BETWEEN CHEMO-RECEPTIVE MODALITIES OF ODOR AND IRRITATION [J].
CAIN, WS ;
MURPHY, CL .
NATURE, 1980, 284 (5753) :255-257
[8]   INTRANASAL TRIGEMINAL STIMULATION FROM ODOROUS VOLATILES - PSYCHOMETRIC RESPONSES FROM ANOSMIC AND NORMAL HUMANS [J].
DOTY, RL ;
BRUGGER, WE ;
JURS, PC ;
ORNDORFF, MA ;
SNYDER, PJ ;
LOWRY, LD .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1978, 20 (02) :175-185
[9]  
EVANS WJ, 1995, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V95, P293, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00055-4
[10]   New techniques for biopsy and culture of human olfactory epithelial neurons [J].
Féron, F ;
Perry, C ;
McGrath, J ;
Mackay-Sim, A .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1998, 124 (08) :861-866