Sweden does not meet agreed national and international forest biodiversity targets: A call for adaptive landscape planning

被引:64
作者
Angelstam, Per [1 ,2 ]
Manton, Michael [2 ]
Green, Martin [3 ]
Jonsson, Bengt-Gunnar [4 ,5 ]
Mikusinski, Grzegorz [1 ,6 ]
Svensson, Johan [4 ]
Sabatini, Francesco Maria [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Fac Forest Sci, Sch Forest Management, POB 43, SE-73921 Skinnskatteberg, Sweden
[2] Vytautas Magnus Univ, Fac Forest Sci & Ecol, Inst Forest Biol & Silviculture, Studentug G 13, LT-53362 Kauno R, Lithuania
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Biol, Swedish Bird Survey, Ecol Bldg, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
[4] Mid Sweden Univ, Dept Nat Sci, SE-85170 Sundsvall, Sweden
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Fac Forest Sci, Dept Wildlife Fish & Environm Studies, SE-90183 Umea, Sweden
[6] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Ecol, Grimso Wildlife Res Stn, SE-73091 Riddarhyttan, Sweden
[7] German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Deutsch Pl 5e, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[8] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Biol, Kirchtor 1, D-06108 Halle, Germany
关键词
Biodiversity conservation targets; Green infrastructure; Connectivity; Landscape approach; Landscape planning; Land ownership; Representativeness; WOODLAND KEY HABITATS; BOREAL FORESTS; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; RETENTION FORESTRY; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; PROTECTED AREAS; DEAD WOOD; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103838
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Loss of forest naturalness challenges the maintenance of green infrastructure (GI) for biodiversity conservation and delivery of diverse ecosystem services. Using the Convention on Biological Diversity's Aichi target #11 with its quantitative and qualitative criteria as a normative model, we aim at supporting landscape planning through a pioneering assessment of the extent to which existing amounts and spatial distributions of High Conservation Value Forests (HCVFs) meet these criteria. Highly forested and committed to both intensive wood production and evidence-based conservation targets of 17-20% protected areas, Sweden was chosen as a case study. Specifically, we estimated the amount, regional representation, and functional connectivity of HCVF patches using virtual bird species, validated the results using field surveys of focal bird species, and assessed conservation target fulfilment. Finally, we linked these results to the regional distribution of forest land ownership categories, and stress that these provide different opportunities for landscape planning. Even if 31% of forest land in Sweden is officially protected, voluntarily set-aside, or not used for wood production now and in the future, we show that applying the representation and connectivity criteria of Aichi target #11 reduces this figure to an effective GI of 12%. When disaggregating the five ecoregions the effective GI was 54% for the sub-alpine forest ecoregion, which hosts EU's last intact forest landscapes, but only 3-8% in the other four ecoregions where wood production is predominant. This results in an increasing need for forest habitat and landscape restoration from north to south. The large regional variation in the opportunity for landscape planning stresses the need for a portfolio of different approaches. We stress the need to secure funding mechanisms for compensating land owners' investments in GI, and to adapt both the approaches and spatial extents of landscape planning units to land ownership structure.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 156 条
[1]   The habitat requirements of hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in managed boreal forest and applicability of forest stand descriptions as a tool to identify suitable patches [J].
Åberg, J ;
Swenson, JE ;
Angelstam, P .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 175 (1-3) :437-444
[2]   Implications of reserve size and forest connectivity for the conservation of wood-inhabiting fungi in Europe [J].
Abrego, Nerea ;
Baessler, Claus ;
Christensen, Morten ;
Heilmann-Clausen, Jacob .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 191 :469-477
[3]   Green infrastructures and intensive forestry: Need and opportunity for spatial planning in a Swedish rural-urban gradient [J].
Andersson, Kjell ;
Angelstam, Per ;
Elbakidze, Marine ;
Axelsson, Robert ;
Degerman, Erik .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2013, 28 (02) :143-165
[4]  
Angelstam P., 2004, Ecological Bulletins, V51, P427
[5]  
Angelstam P, 2001, SCAND J FOREST RES, P38, DOI 10.1080/028275801300090582
[6]  
Angelstam P., 2013, GRON INFRASTRUKTUR B
[7]  
Angelstam P., 2004, Ecological Bulletins, V51, P413
[8]   Landscape concepts and approaches foster learning about ecosystem services [J].
Angelstam, Per ;
Munoz-Rojas, Jose ;
Pinto-Correia, Teresa .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2019, 34 (07) :1445-1460
[9]   LTSER platforms as a place-based transdisciplinary research infrastructure: learning landscape approach through evaluation [J].
Angelstam, Per ;
Manton, Michael ;
Elbakidze, Marine ;
Sijtsma, Frans ;
Adamescu, Mihai Cristian ;
Avni, Noa ;
Beja, Pedro ;
Bezak, Peter ;
Zyablikova, Iryna ;
Cruz, Fatima ;
Bretagnolle, Vincent ;
Diaz-Delgado, Ricardo ;
Ens, Bruno ;
Fedoriak, Mariia ;
Flaim, Giovanna ;
Gingrich, Simone ;
Lavi-Neeman, Miri ;
Medinets, Sergey ;
Melecis, Viesturs ;
Munoz-Rojas, Jose ;
Schackermann, Jessica ;
Stocker-Kiss, Andrea ;
Setala, Heikki ;
Stryamets, Natalie ;
Taka, Maija ;
Tallec, Gaelle ;
Tappeiner, Ulrike ;
Tornblom, Johan ;
Yamelynets, Taras .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2019, 34 (07) :1461-1484
[10]   Model forests in Russia as landscape approach: Demonstration projects or initiatives for learning towards sustainable forest management? [J].
Angelstam, Per ;
Elbakidze, Marine ;
Axelsson, Robert ;
Khoroshev, Alexander ;
Pedroli, Bas ;
Tysiachniouk, Maria ;
Zabubenin, Evgeny .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 101 :96-110