Brazilian Intragastric Balloon Consensus Statement (BIBC): practical guidelines based on experience of over 40,000 cases

被引:81
作者
Neto, Manoel Galvao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Silva, Lyz Bezerra [3 ]
Grecco, Eduardo [4 ]
de Quadros, Luiz Gustavo [4 ]
Teixeira, Andre [5 ]
Souza, Thiago [4 ]
Scarparo, Jimi [6 ]
Parada, Artur A. [1 ]
Dib, Ricardo [4 ]
Moon, Rena [5 ]
Campos, Josemberg [3 ]
机构
[1] 9 Julho Hosp, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Florida Int Univ, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil
[4] Mario Covas State Hosp, ABC Med Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Orlando Hlth, Orlando Reg Med Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
[6] Scarparo Scopia Clin, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Consensus statement; Intragastric balloon; Obesity; Endoscopy; Bariatric endoscopy; OBESITY; METAANALYSIS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2017.09.528
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Intragastric balloons (IGBs) are a minimally invasive option for obesity treatment, acting as a space-occupying device and leading to weight loss through increased satiety. This device has been growing in popularity owing to its safety profile and good weight loss results. However, there are no published guidelines that standardize the technical aspects of the procedure. Objectives: To create a practical guideline for intragastric balloon usage. Setting: Private and Academic Settings, Brazil. Methods: A consensus meeting was held in Sao Paulo, Brazil, in June 2016, bringing together 39 Brazilian endoscopists with extensive experience in IGBs from all regions of the country. Topics on patient selection, indications, contraindications, multidisciplinary follow-up, technique, and adverse events were discussed in the form of questions. After electronic voting, a consensus was defined when there was >= 70% agreement. Experts were also requested to provide data on their experience with IGBs. Results: The selected experts discussed and reached a consensus on 76 questions, mainly concerning specific indications and contraindications for the procedure; technical details, such as patient preparation, minimum balloon-filling volume, techniques for implant and explant; patient follow-up and recommended medication for the adaptation period; and adverse event management. The overall Brazilian expert data encompassed 41,863 IGBs, with a mean percentage total weight loss of 18.4% 2.9%. The adverse event rate after the adaptation period was 2.5%, the most common being hyperinflation (.9%) and spontaneous deflation (.8%) of the device. The early removal rate due to intolerance was 2.2%. Conclusions: The present consensus represents practical recommendations for performing IGB procedures and reflects Brazil's significant experience with this device. The experience of over 40,000 cases shows that the device leads to satisfactory weight loss with a low rate of adverse events. (C) 2018 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 159
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies
    Abu Dayyeh, Barham K.
    Kumar, Nitin
    Edmundowicz, Steven A.
    Jonnalagadda, Sreenivasa
    Larsen, Michael
    Sullivan, Shelby
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    Banerjee, Subhas
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 82 (03) : 425 - +
  • [2] American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery position statement on intragastric balloon therapy endorsed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
    Ali, Mohamed R.
    Moustarah, Fady
    Kim, Julie J.
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2016, 12 (03) : 462 - 467
  • [3] Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus
    Banks, Peter A.
    Bollen, Thomas L.
    Dervenis, Christos
    Gooszen, Hein G.
    Johnson, Colin D.
    Sarr, Michael G.
    Tsiotos, Gregory G.
    Vege, Santhi Swaroop
    [J]. GUT, 2013, 62 (01) : 102 - 111
  • [4] Evidence-based Review of the Bioenterics Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss
    Dumonceau, Jean-Marc
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2008, 18 (12) : 1611 - 1617
  • [5] 2016 Updated MASCC/ESMO Consensus Recommendations: Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Following High Emetic Risk Chemotherapy
    Herrstedt, Jorn
    Roila, Fausto
    Warr, David
    Celio, Luigi
    Navari, Rudolph M.
    Hesketh, Paul J.
    Chan, Alexandre
    Aapro, Matti S.
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2017, 25 (01) : 277 - 288
  • [6] Safety and effectiveness of the intragastric balloon for obesity.: A meta-analysis
    Imaz, Inaki
    Martinez-Cervell, Carmen
    Garcia-Alvarez, Elvira Elena
    Sendra-Gutierrez, Juan Manuel
    Gonzalez-Enriquez, Jesus
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2008, 18 (07) : 841 - 846
  • [7] Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerance of Two Types of Intragastric Balloons Placed in Obese Subjects: A Double-Blind Comparative Study
    Luisa De Castro, Maria
    Jose Morales, Maria
    Del Campo, Victor
    Pineda, Juan R.
    Pena, Eduardo
    Sierra, Jose M.
    Jose Arbones, Maria
    Prada, Ignacio R.
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2010, 20 (12) : 1642 - 1646
  • [8] Effectiveness of intragastric balloon for obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials
    Moura, Diogo
    Oliveira, Joel
    De Moura, Eduardo G. H.
    Bernardo, Wanderlei
    Galvao Neto, Manuel
    Campos, Josemberg
    Popov, Violeta B.
    Thompson, Cristopher
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2016, 12 (02) : 420 - 429
  • [9] An alternative approach to intragastric balloon retrieval
    Neto, Galvao
    Campos, Josemberg
    Ferraz, Alvaro
    Dib, Ricardo
    Ferreira, Flavio
    Moon, Rena
    Teixeira, Andre
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 48 : E73 - E73
  • [10] NIEBEN OG, 1982, LANCET, V1, P198