Energy-use analysis and evaluation of distillation systems through avoidable exergy destruction and investment costs

被引:58
作者
Wei, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Zhang, Bingjian [1 ]
Wu, Shengyuan [1 ]
Chen, Qinglin [1 ]
Tsatsaronis, George [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Key Lab Low Carbon Chem & Energy Conservat Guangd, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Energy Engn, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Avoidable exergy destruction; Distillation; Exergoeconomic evaluation; Exergy analysis; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EXERGOENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS; EXERGOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL-ANALYSES; OPTIMIZATION; RECTIFICATION; EMISSION; RETROFIT; HYDROGEN; HEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.026
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Based on the concepts of avoidable/unavoidable exergy destructions and investment costs, this article presents an exergy analysis and an exergoeconomic evaluation to identify the potential energy savings in distillation processes. Methods for calculating the avoidable/unavoidable exergy destructions and investment costs for distillation columns, and hot-utility/cold-utility heat exchangers are proposed. For a distillation column, the unavoidable exergy destruction is estimated through the minimum reflux ratio, and the unavoidable investment cost is determined according to the minimum theoretical stage number obtained under the condition of total reflux. For the utility heat exchangers, the unavoidable exergy destruction is estimated through the minimum possible temperature difference, and the unavoidable investment cost corresponds to the maximum allowed temperature difference that is related to practical applications. A light-ends separation plant is used to demonstrate the performance of the proposed approach. The results indicate that the exergy-savings potential enables comparisons of energy-savings potentials among different system components, and the value of the cost-savings potential points out the cost that could be avoided in today's technological and economic environment. The modified exergoeconomic factor provides the improvement direction in a more accurate way compared with the conventional one. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 433
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   DISTILLATION COLUMN TARGETS [J].
DHOLE, VR ;
LINNHOFF, B .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 17 (5-6) :549-560
[12]   IMPROVING DISTILLATION COLUMN DESIGN USING THERMODYNAMIC AVAILABILITY ANALYSIS [J].
FITZMORRIS, RE ;
MAH, RSH .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1980, 26 (02) :265-273
[13]  
FONYO Z, 1974, INT CHEM ENG, V14, P203
[14]  
FONYO Z, 1974, INT CHEM ENG, V14, P18
[15]   CAPITAL-COST TARGETS FOR HEAT-EXCHANGER NETWORKS COMPRISING MIXED MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION, PRESSURE RATINGS AND EXCHANGER TYPES [J].
HALL, SG ;
AHMAD, S ;
SMITH, R .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1990, 14 (03) :319-335
[16]   A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy resources for a sustainable future [J].
Hepbasli, Arif .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2008, 12 (03) :593-661
[17]   Advanced exergetic analysis: Approaches for splitting the exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts [J].
Kelly, S. ;
Tsatsaronis, G. ;
Morosuk, T. .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (03) :384-391
[18]   SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems [J].
Lazzaretto, A ;
Tsatsaronis, G .
ENERGY, 2006, 31 (8-9) :1257-1289
[19]   Energy, economy and environment as objectives in multi-criterion optimization of thermal systems design [J].
Lazzaretto, A ;
Toffolo, A .
ENERGY, 2004, 29 (08) :1139-1157
[20]   Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems [J].
Meyer, Lutz ;
Tsatsaronis, George ;
Buchgeister, Jens ;
Schebek, Liselotte .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (01) :75-89