Energy-use analysis and evaluation of distillation systems through avoidable exergy destruction and investment costs

被引:58
作者
Wei, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Zhang, Bingjian [1 ]
Wu, Shengyuan [1 ]
Chen, Qinglin [1 ]
Tsatsaronis, George [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Key Lab Low Carbon Chem & Energy Conservat Guangd, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Energy Engn, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Avoidable exergy destruction; Distillation; Exergoeconomic evaluation; Exergy analysis; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EXERGOENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS; EXERGOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL-ANALYSES; OPTIMIZATION; RECTIFICATION; EMISSION; RETROFIT; HYDROGEN; HEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.026
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Based on the concepts of avoidable/unavoidable exergy destructions and investment costs, this article presents an exergy analysis and an exergoeconomic evaluation to identify the potential energy savings in distillation processes. Methods for calculating the avoidable/unavoidable exergy destructions and investment costs for distillation columns, and hot-utility/cold-utility heat exchangers are proposed. For a distillation column, the unavoidable exergy destruction is estimated through the minimum reflux ratio, and the unavoidable investment cost is determined according to the minimum theoretical stage number obtained under the condition of total reflux. For the utility heat exchangers, the unavoidable exergy destruction is estimated through the minimum possible temperature difference, and the unavoidable investment cost corresponds to the maximum allowed temperature difference that is related to practical applications. A light-ends separation plant is used to demonstrate the performance of the proposed approach. The results indicate that the exergy-savings potential enables comparisons of energy-savings potentials among different system components, and the value of the cost-savings potential points out the cost that could be avoided in today's technological and economic environment. The modified exergoeconomic factor provides the improvement direction in a more accurate way compared with the conventional one. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 433
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review [J].
Abusoglu, Aysegul ;
Kanoglu, Mehmet .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (09) :2295-2308
[2]   Greenhouse gas emission and exergo-environmental analyses of a trigeneration energy system [J].
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Rosen, Marc A. ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2011, 5 (06) :1540-1549
[3]   Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants [J].
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (10) :5886-5898
[4]   Invariant rectifying-stripping curves for targeting minimum energy and feed location in distillation [J].
Bandyopadhyay, S ;
Malik, RK ;
Shenoy, UV .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 23 (08) :1109-1124
[5]  
Bejan A, 1996, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM
[6]   Exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming process for hydrogen production [J].
Boyano, A. ;
Blanco-Marigorta, A. M. ;
Morosuk, T. ;
Tsatsaronis, G. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (04) :2202-2214
[7]   Process analysis using the concept of intrinsic and extrinsic exergy losses [J].
Chang, H ;
Chuang, SC .
ENERGY, 2003, 28 (12) :1203-1228
[8]   Energy-use analysis and improvement for delayed coking units [J].
Chen, QL ;
Yin, QH ;
Wang, SP ;
Hua, B .
ENERGY, 2004, 29 (12-15) :2225-2237
[9]   An exergoeconomic approach for retrofit of fractionating systems [J].
Chen, QL ;
Yin, QH ;
Hua, B .
ENERGY, 2002, 27 (01) :65-75
[10]   Avoidable thermodynamic inefficiencies and costs in an externally fired combined cycle power plant [J].
Cziesla, F ;
Tsatsaronis, G ;
Gao, ZL .
ENERGY, 2006, 31 (10-11) :1472-1489