How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?

被引:0
|
作者
Fox, AJ
机构
[1] Director,
[2] Neuroradiology,undefined
[3] University of Western Ontario,undefined
[4] London Health Sciences Centre,undefined
[5] 339 Windermere Road,undefined
[6] P. O. Box 5339,undefined
[7] London,undefined
[8] Ontario,undefined
[9] Canada N6A 5A5,undefined
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Carotid Stenosis;
D O I
10.1007/s002340050461
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 532
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
    Allan J. Fox
    Neuroradiology, 1997, 39 : 532 - 532
  • [2] How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography?
    Wardlaw, JM
    Lewis, SC
    Humphrey, P
    Young, G
    Collie, D
    Warlow, CP
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 71 (02) : 155 - 160
  • [3] Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis
    Binaghi, S
    Maeder, P
    Uské, A
    Meuwly, JY
    Devuyst, G
    Meuli, RA
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2001, 46 (01) : 25 - 34
  • [4] Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography
    Netuka, David
    Belsan, Tomas
    Broulikova, Karolina
    Mandys, Vaclav
    Charvat, Frantisek
    Malik, Josef
    Coufalova, Lucie
    Bradac, Ondrej
    Ostry, Svatopluk
    Benes, Vladimir
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2016, 158 (08) : 1505 - 1514
  • [5] Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography
    David Netuka
    Tomáš Belšán
    Karolina Broulíková
    Václav Mandys
    František Charvát
    Josef Malík
    Lucie Coufalová
    Ondřej Bradáč
    Svatopluk Ostrý
    Vladimír Beneš
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2016, 158 : 1505 - 1514
  • [6] Interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis - effect of observer experience
    Wardlaw, JM
    Lewis, SC
    Collie, DA
    Sellar, R
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2002, 44 (02) : 126 - 132
  • [7] Magnetic resonance angiography: Technique and applications for the study of carotid artery stenosis
    Vilanova Gallart, Pau
    Muniz Ribas, Baraq
    Moreno Pigem, Jordi
    IMAGEN DIAGNOSTICA, 2014, 5 (01): : 24 - 31
  • [8] Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis - A systematic review
    Nederkoorn, PJ
    van der Graaf, Y
    Hunink, M
    STROKE, 2003, 34 (05) : 1324 - 1331
  • [9] Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis
    D'Onofrio, M
    Mansueto, G
    Faccioli, N
    Guarise, A
    Tamellini, P
    Bogina, G
    Mucelli, RP
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2006, 111 (01): : 93 - 103
  • [10] The accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease - A comparison with digital subtraction angiography using NASCET criteria for stenosis measurement
    Levi, CR
    Mitchell, A
    Fitt, G
    Donnan, GA
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 1996, 6 (04) : 231 - 236