Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in the Treatment of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain A Randomized, Double-blind Exploratory Study

被引:50
|
作者
O'Connell, Neil E. [1 ]
Cossar, John [1 ]
Marston, Louise [3 ]
Wand, Benedict M.
Bunce, David [2 ]
De Souza, Lorraine H. [1 ]
Maskill, David W. [1 ]
Sharp, Andrew [4 ,5 ]
Moseley, G. Lorimer [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ, Sch Hlth Sci & Social Care, Rehabil Res Ctr, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
[2] Brunel Univ, Ctr Cognit & Neuroimaging, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
[3] UCL, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
[4] Hillingdon Hosp NHS Trust, Physiotherapy Dept, Hillingdon, Middx, England
[5] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Sch Physiotherapy, Fremantle, WA, Australia
[6] Univ S Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[7] Neurosci Res Australia NeuRA, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN | 2013年 / 29卷 / 01期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
transcranial direct current stimulation; chronic nonspecific low back pain; sham; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1097/AJP.0b013e318247ec09
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: To test the proof of principle that active anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the motor cortex reduces pain significantly more than sham stimulation in a group of participants with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Methods: The study utilized a within-participants sham-controlled, interrupted time series design. A sample of 8 participants was recruited. After 3 days of baseline measures, patients entered a 15-day experimental period (Mondays to Fridays) for 3 consecutive weeks. During this period each patient received sham stimulation daily until a randomly allocated day when active stimulation was commenced. Active stimulation was then given daily for the remaining days of the experimental period. Both the participants and the assessors were blinded. The primary outcomes were average pain intensity and unpleasantness in the last 24 hours measured using a visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes included self-reported disability, depression and anxiety, a battery of cognitive tests to monitor for unwanted effects of stimulation, and patients' perceptions of whether they had received active or sham stimulation. Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Results: No significant effect was seen in the primary outcomes between active and sham stimulation (average pain intensity P=0.821, unpleasantness P=0.937) or across any other clinical variables. There was evidence that patients may have been able to distinguish between the active and sham conditions (P=0.035). Discussion: These results do not provide evidence that tDCS is effective in the treatment of chronic back pain. The use of a small convenience sample limits the generalizability of these findings and precludes definitive conclusions on the efficacy of tDCS in chronic nonspecific low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: results of a double-blind randomized study
    Hamani, Clement
    Fonoff, Erich T.
    Parravano, Daniella C.
    Silva, Valquiria A.
    Galhardoni, Ricardo
    Monaco, Bernardo A.
    Navarro, Jessie
    Yeng, Lin T.
    Teixeira, Manoel J.
    de Andrade, Daniel Ciampi
    BRAIN, 2021, 144 : 2994 - 3004
  • [2] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Aerobic Exercise for the Treatment of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
    Sanchez, Marina Castel
    Prieto, Rafael
    Maffezzoli, Gioel Luca
    Frumento, Lorenzo
    Aguilera, Jose Francisco Torneno
    Perez, Jose Luis Alonso
    Reina, Maria Dolores Sosa
    TOPICS IN GERIATRIC REHABILITATION, 2024, 40 (02) : 108 - 117
  • [3] Efficacy of motor cortex stimulation in the treatment of neuropathic pain:: a randomized double-blind trial
    Velasco, Francisco
    Arguelles, Carlos
    Carrillo-Ruiz, Jose D.
    Castro, Guillermo
    Velasco, Ana Luisa
    Jimenez, Fiacro
    Velasco, Marcos
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 108 (04) : 698 - 706
  • [4] Effect of dry-electrode-based transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic low back pain and low back muscle activities: A double-blind sham-controlled study
    Jiang, Naifu
    Wei, Jinsong
    Li, Guangsheng
    Wei, Bo
    Zhu, Frank F.
    Hu, Yong
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 38 (01) : 41 - 54
  • [5] Botulinum toxin A and chronic low back pain - A randomized, double-blind study
    Foster, L
    Clapp, L
    Erickson, M
    Jabbari, B
    NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (10) : 1290 - 1293
  • [6] Transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb neuropathic pain: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Lewis, G. N.
    Rice, D. A.
    Kluger, M.
    McNair, P. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 22 (07) : 1312 - 1320
  • [7] Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment resistant depression: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Palm, U.
    Schiller, C.
    Fintescu, Z.
    Obermeier, M.
    Keeser, D.
    Reisinger, E.
    Pogarell, O.
    Nitsche, M. A.
    Moeller, H-J
    Padberg, F.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (03) : 242 - 251
  • [8] Osteopathic manipulation treatment versus therapeutic exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: A randomized, controlled and double-blind study
    Meirelles, Frederico de Oliveira
    de Oliveira Muniz Cunha, Julio Cesar
    da Silva, Elirez Bezerra
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 33 (03) : 367 - 377
  • [9] Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial
    Armbrust, Danilo
    Areas, Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco
    Fonseca, Carlos Luques
    da Silva Areas, Fernando Zanela
    de Almeida Carvalho Duarte, Natalia
    Santana, Silvia Ataide Alves
    Dumont, Arislander Jonathan Lopes
    Neto, Hugo Pasin
    Oliveira, Claudia Santos
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 38 (12) : 1609 - 1621
  • [10] TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION DECREASES CHRONIC PAIN IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED, DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL
    Pilotti, S.
    Cavalheiro Do Espirito Santo, R.
    Franca, B.
    Santos, L.
    Gasparini Vieira, M. L.
    Santos de Souza, T. J.
    Ermel, B.
    Mallmann, A. L.
    Pereira, D.
    Caumo, W.
    Xavier, R.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2023, 82 : 1430 - 1431