共 50 条
Probiotics Reduce Mortality and Morbidity in Preterm, Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
被引:145
|作者:
Morgan, Rebecca L.
[1
]
Preidis, Geoffrey A.
[2
,3
]
Kashyap, Purna C.
[4
]
Weizman, Adam, V
[5
]
Sadeghirad, Behnam
[1
,6
,7
]
机构:
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Sect Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Texas Childrens Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Enter Neurosci Program, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Anesthesia, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Michael G DeGroote Inst Pain Res & Care, 1280 Main St West,MDCL 2112, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
关键词:
Commensal;
Microbiota;
Supplement;
Newborn;
LATE-ONSET SEPSIS;
NEONATAL NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS;
REUTERI DSM 17938;
BIFIDOBACTERIUM-BREVE;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
PREMATURE-INFANTS;
PROPHYLACTIC PROBIOTICS;
LACTOBACILLUS-REUTERI;
ORAL SUPPLEMENTATION;
FEEDING TOLERANCE;
D O I:
10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.096
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of single- vs multiple-strain probiotics in a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, BIOSIS Previews, and Google Scholar through January 1, 2019, for studies of single-strain and multistrain probiotic formulations on the outcomes of preterm, low-birth-weight neonates. We used a frequentist approach for network meta-analysis and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, severe necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (Bell stage II or more), and culture-proven sepsis. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 63 trials involving 15,712 preterm infants. Compared with placebo, a combination of 1 or more Lactobacillus species (spp) and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp was the only intervention with moderate- or high-quality evidence of reduced all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.80). Among interventions with moderate- or high-quality evidence for efficacy compared with placebo, combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp, Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis, Lactobacillus reuteri, or Lactobacillus rhamnosus significantly reduced severe NEC (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.20-0.59]; OR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.74]; OR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.34-0.91]; and OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.21-0.90], respectively). There was moderate-or high-quality evidence that combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp and Saccharomyces boulardii reduced the number of days to reach full feeding (mean reduction of 3.30 days [95% CI, reduction of 5.91-0.69 days]). There was moderate- or high-quality evidence that, compared with placebo, the single-species product B animalis subsp lactis or L reuteri significantly reduced duration of hospitalization (mean reduction of 13.00 days [95% CI, reduction of 22.71-3.29 days] and mean reduction of 7.89 days [95% CI, reduction of 11.60-4.17 days], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In a systematic review and network meta-analysis of studies to determine the effects of single-strain and multistrain probiotic formulations on outcomes of preterm, low-birth-weight neonates, we found moderate to high evidence for the superiority of combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp vs single- and other multiple-strain probiotic treatments. The combinations of Bacillus spp and Enterococcus spp, and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp and Streptococcus salivarius subsp thermophilus, might produce the largest reduction in NEC development. Further trials are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 480
页数:14
相关论文