Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Nonoperative Care

被引:2
|
作者
Hoh, Daniel J. [1 ]
Qureshi, Sheeraz [2 ]
Anderson, Paul A. [3 ]
Arnold, Paul M. [4 ]
Chi, John H. [5 ]
Dailey, Andrew T. [6 ]
Dhall, Sanjay S. [7 ]
Eichholz, Kurt M. [8 ]
Harrop, James S. [9 ,10 ]
Rabb, Craig H. [6 ]
Raksin, P. B. [11 ,12 ]
Kaiser, Michael G. [13 ]
O'Toole, John E. [12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Lillian S Wells Dept Neurol Surg, Box 100265, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Orthoped & Rehabil, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Kansas City, KS USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Univ Utah, Dept Neurosurg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] St Louis Minimally Invas Spine Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
[9] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[10] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[11] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, John H Stroger Jr Hosp Cook Cty, Div Neurosurg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[12] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[13] Columbia Univ, Dept Neurosurg, New York, NY USA
关键词
Bracing; Nonoperative care; Orthosis; Lumbar burst fracture; Thoracic burst fracture; BURST FRACTURES; LUMBAR SPINE; MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY; INJURY;
D O I
10.1093/neuros/nyy369
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Thoracic and lumbar burst fractures in neurologically intact patients are considered to be inherently stable, and responsive to nonsurgical management. There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal conservative treatment modality. The question remains whether external bracing is necessary vs mobilization without a brace after these injuries. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the use of external bracing improves outcomes compared to no brace for neurologically intact patients with thoracic or lumbar burst fractures. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using the National Library of Medicine PubMed database and the Cochrane Library for studies relevant to thoracolumbar trauma. Clinical studies specifically comparing external bracing to no brace for neurologically intact patients with thoracic or lumbar burst fractures were selected for review. RESULTS: Three studies out of 1137 met inclusion criteria for review. One randomized controlled trial (level I) and an additional randomized controlled pilot study (level II) provided evidence that both external bracing and no brace equally improve pain and disability in neurologically intact patients with burst fractures. There was no difference in final clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients treated with an external brace vs no brace. One additional level IV retrospective study demonstrated equivalent clinical outcomes for external bracing vs no brace. CONCLUSION: This evidence-based guideline provides a grade B recommendation that management either with or without an external brace is an option given equivalent improvement in outcomes for neurologically intact patients with thoracic and lumbar burst fractures. The decision to use an external brace is at the discretion of the treating physician, as bracing is not associated with increased adverse events compared to no brace. RECOMMENDATIONS: QUESTION: Does the use of external bracing improve outcomes in the nonoperative treatment of neurologically intact patients with thoracic and lumbar burst fractures? RECOMMENDATION: The decision to use an external brace is at the discretion of the treating physician, as the nonoperative management of neurologically intact patients with thoracic and lumbar burst fractures either with or without an external brace produces equivalent improvement in outcomes. Bracing is not associated with increased adverse events compared to not bracing. Strength of Recommendation: Grade B
引用
收藏
页码:E46 / E49
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evidence-based primary care treatment guidelines for skin infections in Europe: A comparative analysis
    van Bijnen, Evelien M. E.
    Paget, John
    den Heijer, Casper D. J.
    Stobberingh, Ellen E.
    Bruggeman, Cathrien A.
    Schellevis, Francois G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (04) : 294 - 300
  • [32] Evidence-based recommendations for the prophylactic use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in neurosurgery: a systematic review of guidelines
    Jiang, Meizhu
    Xu, Yanan
    Yang, Li
    Yan, Yilong
    Zhou, Han
    Song, Wanqing
    Wang, Xinyue
    Sun, Haiyang
    Yao, Xuetong
    Zhao, Zhigang
    Li, Cao
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2025, 272 (01)
  • [33] Primary Care Physicians' Knowledge of Autism and Evidence-Based Interventions for Autism: A Systematic Review
    McCormack, Gerard
    Dillon, Alison C.
    Healy, Olive
    Walsh, Chloe
    Lydon, Sinead
    REVIEW JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2020, 7 (03) : 226 - 241
  • [34] Evaluation and treatment of low back pain: An evidence-based approach to clinical care
    Atlas, SJ
    Nardin, RA
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2003, 27 (03) : 265 - 284
  • [35] Evidence-based review of trauma center care and routine palliative care processes for geriatric trauma patients; A collaboration from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Patient Assessment Committee, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Geriatric Trauma Committee, and the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Guidelines Committee
    Aziz, Hiba Abdel
    Lunde, John
    Barraco, Robert
    Como, John J.
    Cooper, Zara
    Hayward, Thomas
    Hwang, Franchesca
    Lottenberg, Lawrence
    Mentzer, Caleb
    Mosenthal, Anne
    Mukherjee, Kaushik
    Nash, Joshua
    Robinson, Bryce
    Staudenmayer, Kristan
    Wright, Rebecca
    Yon, James
    Crandall, Marie
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2019, 86 (04) : 737 - 743
  • [36] Review of Select Practice Parameters, Evidence-Based Treatment Algorithms, and International Guidelines for Hereditary Angioedema
    Jose, Jaison
    Zacharias, Jamie
    Craig, Timothy
    CLINICAL REVIEWS IN ALLERGY & IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 51 (02) : 193 - 206
  • [37] Evidence-based veterinary dermatology:: a systematic review of interventions for treatment of Pseudomonas otitis in dogs
    Nuttall, Tim
    Cole, Lynette K.
    VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 18 (02) : 69 - 77
  • [38] Evidence-based treatment choices for acute lateral ankle sprain: a comprehensive systematic review
    Altomare, D.
    Fusco, G.
    Bertolino, E.
    Ranieri, R.
    Sconza, C.
    Lipina, M.
    Kon, E.
    Marcacci, M.
    Bianchini, L.
    Di Matteo, B.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (06) : 1875 - 1884
  • [39] An integrative review on treatment guidelines for complicated urinary tract infections: a synthesis of evidence-based recommendations
    Bittencourt, Amanda Azevedo
    de Paula, Marina Della Negra
    Padula Ribeiro-Pereira, Ana Carolina
    Batista, Paula de Mendonca
    Polis, Thales Jose
    REVISTA DO INSTITUTO DE MEDICINA TROPICAL DE SAO PAULO, 2025, 67
  • [40] Methodological Quality of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treatment Evidence-Based Guidelines: A Systematic Review Using the AGREE II and AGREE REX Tools
    Vilela, Ana Paula Oliveira
    Deffert, Flavia
    Lucchetta, Rosa Camila
    Pires, Yara Maria da Silva
    Mainka, Felipe Fernando
    Tonin, Fernanda S.
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2024,