Classification of Postoperative Complications in Robotic-assisted Compared With Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer

被引:21
作者
Barrie, Allison [1 ]
Freeman, Alexandra H. [1 ]
Lyon, Liisa [2 ]
Garcia, Christine [3 ]
Conell, Carol [2 ]
Abbott, Laura H. [1 ]
Littell, Ramey D. [4 ]
Powell, C. Bethan [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Obstet & Gynecol, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif Gynecol Canc Pro, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Minimally invasive hysterectomy; Robotic surgery; Surgical complications; OUTCOMES; LAPAROTOMY; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.832
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To compare intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications and outcomes between robotic assisted and laparoscopic surgical management of endometrial cancer using a standardized classification system. Design: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: An integrated health care system in Northern California. Patients: One thousand four hundred thirty-three women with a diagnosis of complex atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer managed by minimally invasive hysterectomy and surgical staging from January 2009 to January 2014. Interventions: Seven hundred forty-five robotic-assisted and 688 laparoscopic hysterectomies were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was intraoperative and postoperative complications within 30 days. All complications were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Secondary outcomes included total operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, length of stay, conversion to laparotomy, and number of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes retrieved. The modality of hysterectomy was not associated with either overall intraoperative complications or major postoperative complications (p>.1). However, there were significantly fewer minor postoperative complications with robotic surgery (16.6% vs 25.6%, p<.01). Statistically significant differences were also noted in the following outcomes: decreased median operative time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, and median number of lymph nodes retrieved in the robotic group when compared with the laparoscopic group. Conclusion: There was no difference in the rate of major complication between robotic and laparoscopic surgery using the Clavien-Dindo system of categorizing surgical complications; however, there were clinically significant differences favoring the robotic approach, including a lower rate of minor complications and conversion rate to laparotomy. (C) 2016 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1188
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy [J].
Boggess, John F. ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Ridgway, Mildred ;
Skinner, Elizabeth N. ;
Fowler, Wesley C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (04) :357.e1-357.e7
[2]   Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center [J].
Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel ;
Adams, Sarah ;
Bhat, Suneel B. ;
Randall, Thomas C. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :224-228
[3]   Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer [J].
Coronado, Pluvio J. ;
Herraiz, Miguel A. ;
Magrina, Javier F. ;
Fasero, Maria ;
Vidart, Jose A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2012, 165 (02) :289-294
[4]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[5]   Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Compared With Traditional Laparoscopic and Laparotomy Approaches A Systematic Review [J].
Gaia, Giorgia ;
Holloway, Robert W. ;
Santoro, Luigi ;
Ahmad, Sarfraz ;
Di Silverio, Elena ;
Spinillo, Arsenio .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (06) :1422-1431
[6]   Outcomes and Cost Comparisons After Introducing a Robotics Program for Endometrial Cancer Surgery [J].
Lau, Susie ;
Vaknin, Zvi ;
Ramana-Kumar, Agnihotram V. ;
Halliday, Darron ;
Franco, Eduardo L. ;
Gotlieb, Walter H. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (04) :717-724
[7]   A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: A case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients [J].
Lim, Peter C. ;
Kang, Elizabeth ;
Park, Do Hwan .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 120 (03) :413-418
[8]   Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Maenpaa, Minna M. ;
Nieminen, Kari ;
Tomas, Eija I. ;
Laurila, Marita ;
Luukkaala, Tiina H. ;
Maenpaa, Johanna U. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (05) :588.e1-588.e7
[9]   Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urologic Surgical Procedures: An ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel Assessment and Recommendations [J].
Mitropoulos, Dionysios ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Remzi, Mesut ;
Roupret, Morgan ;
Truss, Michael .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (02) :341-349
[10]   Laparoscopy vs Robotics in Surgical Management of Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications [J].
Seror, Julien ;
Bats, Anne-Sophie ;
Huchon, Cyrille ;
Bensaid, Cherazade ;
Douay-Hauser, Nathalie ;
Lecuru, Fabrice .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (01) :120-125