Learning to use the Researcher ID as a research production indicator

被引:5
作者
Alonso Olivas-Avila, Jose [1 ]
Musi-Lechuga, Bertha [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Ciudad Juarez, Ciudad Juarez 32300, Chihuahua, Mexico
关键词
Scientific production; Researcher ID; Web of Science; Descriptive study; JOURNAL IMPACT; TRANSNATIONAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY; H-INDEX; SPANISH; WEB; ARTICLES; PROFESSORS; SCIENCE; BENZODIAZEPINES;
D O I
10.1016/S1697-2600(13)70030-9
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The research focused on the development of scientific production measurements implies a detailed and quite accurately procedure to avoid errors and misinterpretations by third parties. The use of public researcher profiles such as the Researcher ID among others, may appeal to simplify the process of direct search on databases. The purpose of this research is to analyze the Researcher ID profile as an indicator of scientific productivity in a sample of 8 Spanish professors of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment area and compare these professors searching them in the Web of Science, also respond to a disagreement generated from a previous study published in Psicothema and culminated in a letter, as that there are unfounded arguments exposed. The results show that there are inaccuracies in the Researcher ID's and therefore cannot be used as an indicator of scientific production, since this toot allows to include any record type (letters, meeting abstracts, etc..) even unrelated content to the Web of Science. These findings are discussed a view to the disagreement and previously mentioned and generated in Psicothema. (c) 2013 Asociacion Espanola de Psicologia Conductual. Publicado por Elsevier Espana, S.L. Todos los derechos reservados.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 260
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Olivas-Avila JA, 2012, PSICOTHEMA, V24, P594
  • [2] Olivas-Avila JA, 2012, INT J CLIN HLTH PSYC, V12, P503
  • [3] Differences in Impact Factor Across Fields and Over Time
    Althouse, Benjamin M.
    West, Jevin D.
    Bergstrom, Carl T.
    Bergstrom, Theodore
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (01): : 27 - 34
  • [4] ASCB, 2013, SAN FRANC DECL RES A
  • [5] Positive and negative aspects of citation indices and journal impact factors
    Balaban, Alexandru T.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 92 (02) : 241 - 247
  • [6] A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Mutz, Ruediger
    Hug, Sven E.
    Daniel, Hans-Dieter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (03) : 346 - 359
  • [7] Buela-Casal G, 2003, PSICOTHEMA, V15, P23
  • [8] Buela-Casal G, 2012, PSICOTHEMA, V24, P505
  • [9] What do the scientists think about the impact factor?
    Buela-Casal, Gualberto
    Zych, Izabela
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 92 (02) : 281 - 292
  • [10] Buela-Casal G, 2011, INT J CLIN HLTH PSYC, V11, P95