Ernbolic protection filters for carotid stenting: Differences in flow obstruction depending on filter construction

被引:21
作者
Hendriks, JM
Zindler, JD
van der Lugt, A
Pattynarna, PMT
van Sambeek, MRHM
Bosch, JL
van Dijk, LC
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Vasc Surg, Med Ctr, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Med Ctr, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
carotid artery; stent; embolus protection devices; hemodynamics; pressure gradient;
D O I
10.1583/04-1325.1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the pressure gradient and degree of flow reduction associated with embolus protection filters for carotid stenting in an in vitro experiment. Methods: Three filter devices with a perforated membrane design and one wire mesh type filter were tested. At a pressure of 70 mmHg, the flow reduction and pressure gradient were measured in a 5-mm tube using blood-mimicking fluid. Results: The pressure gradient in the wire mesh filter was 1.65 +/- 0.49 mmHg (95% Cl 1.32 to 1.86). The mean pressure gradient in the perforated membrane filters was 6.88 +/- 2.62 mmHg (95% CI 6.22 to 7.55, p < 0.0001). There was also a significant correlation between pressure gradient and flow reduction (r=-0.77, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Embolic protection filters cause a pressure gradient and obstruct blood flow. This effect is marked in perforated membrane filters and almost absent in the wire mesh filter.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 50
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Multicenter evaluation of carotid artery stenting with a filter protection system [J].
Al-Mubarak, N ;
Colombo, A ;
Gaines, PA ;
Iyer, SS ;
Corvaja, N ;
Cleveland, TJ ;
Macdonald, S ;
Brennan, C ;
Vitek, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (05) :841-846
[2]   Cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting -: Collection and histopathologic analysis of embolized debris [J].
Angelini, A ;
Reimers, B ;
Della Barbera, M ;
Saccà, S ;
Pasquetto, G ;
Cernetti, C ;
Valente, M ;
Pascotto, P ;
Thiene, G .
STROKE, 2002, 33 (02) :456-461
[3]  
Howell M, 2002, J ENDOVASC THER, V9, P810, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2002)009<0810:COPSBP>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy [J].
Jordan, WD ;
Voellinger, DC ;
Doblar, DD ;
Plyushcheva, NP ;
Fisher, WS ;
McDowell, HA .
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 7 (01) :33-38
[6]   Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices -: A systematic review of the literature [J].
Kastrup, A ;
Gröschel, K ;
Krapf, H ;
Brehm, BR ;
Dichgans, J ;
Schulz, JB .
STROKE, 2003, 34 (03) :813-819
[7]   Acute hemodynamic changes during carotid artery stenting [J].
Mendelsohn, FO ;
Weissman, NJ ;
Lederman, RJ ;
Crowley, JJ ;
Gray, JL ;
Phillips, HR ;
Alberts, MJ ;
McCann, RL ;
Smith, TP ;
Stack, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (09) :1077-1081
[8]  
Mlekusch W, 2003, J ENDOVASC THER, V10, P851, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2003)010<0851:HABAEC>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   An in vitro analysis of a carotid artery stent with a protective porous membrane [J].
Müller-Hülsbeck, S ;
Hüsler, EJ ;
Schaffner, SR ;
Jahnke, T ;
Glass, C ;
Wenke, R ;
Heller, M .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 15 (11) :1295-1305