Decision heuristics and tax perception - An analysis of a tax-cut-cum-base-broadening policy

被引:20
作者
Blaufus, Kay [1 ]
Bob, Jonathan [1 ]
Hundsdoerfer, Jochen [2 ]
Kiesewetter, Dirk [3 ]
Weimann, Joachim [4 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Sch Econ & Management, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Sch Business & Econ, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Wurzburg, Fac Econ & Management, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
[4] Univ Magdeburg, Fac Econ & Management, D-39016 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
Behavioral public finance; Decision heuristics; Framing effects; Perceived tax burden; Tax-cut-cum-base-broadening; TAXATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.joep.2012.12.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, both a conjoint analysis and a lab experiment are conducted to analyze the influence of changes in the tax rate and the tax base on the perceived tax burden. Our results show that the majority of individuals do not make rational tax decisions based on the actual tax burden but rather use simple decision heuristics. This leads to an irrationally high impact of changes in nominal tax rates on the perceived tax burden. Taxpayers favor tax options that apply a lower tax rate on their gross income over a higher tax rate applied on their net income despite the lower actual tax burden of the latter option. This result suggests that politicians could combine increasing fiscal revenues and decreasing subjects' tax perception. Furthermore, overestimation of tax rate changes increases considerably when information on tax rate is considered first (framing effect). (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   LOGIT-MODELS FOR SETS OF RANKED ITEMS [J].
ALLISON, PD ;
CHRISTAKIS, NA .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY 1994, VOL 24, 1994, 24 :199-228
[2]  
Blaufus K., 2009, Schmalenbach Business Review, V61, P60, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF03396780
[3]  
Boylan S., 2006, The Journal of the American Taxation Association, V28, P69, DOI [10.2308/jata.2006.28.2.69, DOI 10.2308/JATA.2006.28.2.69]
[4]   The priority heuristic:: Making choices without trade-offs [J].
Brandstätter, E ;
Gigerenzer, G ;
Hertwig, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 113 (02) :409-432
[5]   MODEL MISSPECIFICATION IN MULTIATTRIBUTE PARAMETER-ESTIMATION [J].
CARMONE, FJ ;
GREEN, PE .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1981, 18 (01) :87-93
[6]   Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence [J].
Chetty, Raj ;
Looney, Adam ;
Kroft, Kory .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (04) :1145-1177
[7]  
Chrzan K., 1994, Mark Lett, V5, P165, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00994106
[8]   House Money Effects in Public Good Experiments [J].
Clark, Jeremy .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 5 (03) :223-231
[9]   Influencing the prospects of tax evasion [J].
Elffers, H ;
Hessing, DJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 18 (2-3) :289-304
[10]   The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic [J].
Epley, N ;
Gilovich, T .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (04) :311-318