Dose-dependent effects of tamsulosin on the ejaculation and semen quality in bucks

被引:2
作者
Kimsakulvech, Sakdichod [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Suttiyotin, Peerasak [3 ]
Pinyopummin, Anuchai [4 ]
机构
[1] Kasetsart Univ, Ctr Agr Biotechnol, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
[2] AG BIO PERDO CHE, Ctr Excellence Agr Biotechnol, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Dept Preclin & Appl Anim Sci, Fac Vet Med, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
[4] Kasetsart Univ, Dept Large Anim & Wildlife Clin Sci, Fac Vet Med, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
关键词
Alpha adrenoceptor antagonist; tamsulosin; buck; semen; ejaculation; INTRAURETHRAL PRESSURE ELEVATION; ANTAGONISTS; RATS; ALFUZOSIN; DOGS; BEHAVIOR; GOAT;
D O I
10.3906/vet-1412-68
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of tamsulosin (TAM) dosages on ejaculation and semen quality. Two sets of Latin square experiment design were applied to 6 bucks receiving normal saline (CON), TAM 134.8 nM/kg (LTAM), or 269.7 (HTAM) nM/kg at 1-week intervals. Semen collection, libido, and ejaculatory scoring were undertaken at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h after injection. Heart rate and body temperature were measured before administration and at 30 min, and before semen collection. The results showed that libido score and heart rate were not affected by treatments. Ejaculatory suppression was observed in both TAM groups. The percentage of ejaculatory suppression was 91.7% by 3 h for both TAM dosages and gradually diminished. Ejaculatory recovery in all bucks was observed by 12 h. Ejaculatory suppression remained unchanged between LTAM and HTAM, but HTAM caused more anejaculation by 6 h (P < 0.05). Some semen parameters of both TAM groups were significantly different from the CON group from 6 to 12 h; however, the values returned to being similar by 24 h. Both TAM dosages had temporary effects on ejaculatory suppression and semen quality, and the effective period was dose-dependent.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 471
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Ejaculatory dysfunction:: Why all α-blockers are not equal [J].
Andersson, KE ;
Wyllie, MG .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (09) :876-877
[2]   USE OF RECOMBINANT ALPHA(1)-ADRENOCEPTORS TO CHARACTERIZE SUBTYPE SELECTIVITY OF DRUGS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PROSTATIC HYPERTROPHY [J].
FOGLAR, R ;
SHIBATA, K ;
HORIE, K ;
HIRASAWA, A ;
TSUJIMOTO, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY-MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY SECTION, 1995, 288 (02) :201-207
[3]   Effects of Herbal Preparation on Libido and Semen Quality in Boars [J].
Frydrychova, S. ;
Opletal, L. ;
Macakova, K. ;
Lustykova, A. ;
Rozkot, M. ;
Lipensky, J. .
REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2011, 46 (04) :573-578
[4]   A comparison of the effects of tamsulosin and alfuzosin on neurally evoked increases in bladder neck and seminal vesicle pressure in rats [J].
Giuliano, F ;
Bernabe, J ;
Droupy, S ;
Alexandre, L ;
Allard, J .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 93 (04) :605-608
[5]   Comparison between tamsulosin and alfuzosin on the expulsion phase of ejaculation in rats [J].
Giuliano, Francois A. ;
Clement, Pierre ;
Denys, Pierre ;
Alexandre, Laurent ;
Bernabe, Jacques .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 98 (04) :876-879
[6]   Effects of acute treatment with tamsulosin versus alfuzosin on ejaculatory function in normal volunteers [J].
Hellstrom, Wayne J. G. ;
Sikka, Suresh C. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (04) :1529-1533
[7]   Ejaculatory disorder caused by alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists is not retrograde ejaculation but a loss of seminal emission [J].
Hisasue, Shin-ichi ;
Furuya, Ryoji ;
Itoh, Naoki ;
Kobayashi, Ko ;
Furuya, Seiji ;
Tsukamoto, Taiji .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 13 (10) :1311-1316
[8]  
Joni LF, 2002, CLIN TECH SMALL AN P, V17, P104
[9]   Influence of ejaculation frequency on sperm characteristics, ionic composition and enzymatic activity of seminal plasma in rams [J].
Kaya, A ;
Aksoy, M ;
Tekeli, T .
SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2002, 44 (02) :153-158
[10]   Effects of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist (tamsulosin) on incident of ejaculation and semen quality in the goat [J].
Kimsakulvech, S. ;
Suttiyotin, P. ;
Pinyopummin, A. .
ANDROLOGIA, 2015, 47 (03) :354-359