Training robotic surgery in urology: experience and opinions of robot urologists

被引:5
作者
Brinkman, W. M. [1 ]
Schout, B. M. A. [2 ,3 ]
Rietbergen, J. B. [4 ]
de Vries, A. H. [1 ]
van der Poel, H. G. [4 ,5 ]
Koldewijn, E. L. [1 ,6 ]
Witjes, J. A. [7 ]
van Merrienboer, J. J. G. [6 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Urol, NL-5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Med Ctr Alkmaar, Dept Urol, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[3] VU Med Ctr Amsterdam, EMGO Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] St Franciscus Gasthuis, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, FHML, Dept Educ Dev & Res, Maastricht, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
robot training; expert opinion; interview; ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.1631
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundTo answer the research questions: (a) what were the training pathways followed by the first generation of robot urologists; and (b) what are their opinions on the ideal training for the future generation? MethodsData were gathered with a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews in a mixed-method research design. ResultsThe results show that training approaches differed from hardly any formal training to complete self-initiated training programmes, with all available learning resources. The median number of supervised procedures at the start of robot-assisted laparoscopy was five (range 0-100). Before patient-related console time, respondents indicated that the minimum training of robot trainees should consist of: live observations (94% indicated this as essential), video observations (90%), knowledge (88%), table assisting (87%) and basic skills (70%). ConclusionThe first generation of robot urologists used different training approaches to start robotic surgery. There is a need for a structured and compulsory training programme for robotic surgery. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 318
页数:11
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators a systematic review [J].
Abboudi, Hamid ;
Khan, Mohammed S. ;
Aboumarzouk, Omar ;
Guru, Khurshid A. ;
Challacombe, Ben ;
Dasgupta, Prokar ;
Ahmed, Kamran .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (02) :194-205
[2]   Current status of robotic assisted pelvic surgery and future developments [J].
Ahmed, Kamran ;
Khan, Mohammad Shamim ;
Vats, Amit ;
Nagpal, Kamal ;
Priest, Oliver ;
Patel, Vanash ;
Vecht, Joshua A. ;
Ashrafian, Hutan ;
Yang, Guang-Zhong ;
Athanasiou, Thanos ;
Darzi, Ara .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 7 (05) :431-440
[3]   Immediate impact of a robotic kidney surgery course on attendees practice patterns [J].
Altunrende, Fatih ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Haber, Georges-Pascal ;
Laydner, Humberto ;
White, Michael A. ;
Khanna, Rakesh ;
Stein, Robert J. ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2011, 7 (02) :165-169
[4]   Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes [J].
Atug, F ;
Castle, EP ;
Srivastav, SK ;
Burgess, SV ;
Thomas, R ;
Davis, R .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) :866-872
[5]  
Coxs M, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V355, P2664
[6]   Initial experience of teaching robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to surgeons-in-training: can training be evaluated and standardized? [J].
Davis, John W. ;
Kamat, Ashish ;
Munsell, Mark ;
Pettaway, Curtis ;
Pisters, Louis ;
Matin, Surena .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (08) :1148-1154
[7]  
Herron DM, 2008, SURG ENDOSC, V22, P313, DOI 10.1007/s00464-007-9727-5
[8]  
Hung AJ, 2013, BJU INT, V112, P864, DOI 10.1111/bju.12045
[9]  
Lees JY, 2011, J UROLOGY, V185, P1191
[10]  
Ous YC, 2011, BJU INT, V108, P420