Process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: A process evaluation

被引:26
作者
Bleijlevens, Michel H. C. [1 ,8 ]
Hendriks, Marike R. C. [2 ,3 ,8 ]
van Haastregt, Jolanda C. M. [4 ,8 ]
van Rossum, Erik [4 ,5 ,8 ]
Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M. [4 ,8 ]
Diederiks, Joseph P. M. [6 ]
Crebolder, Harry F. J. M. [7 ,8 ]
van Eijk, Jacques ThM [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Social Med, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Hlth Org Econ & Policy, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Hosp Maastricht, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Med Technol Assessment, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Hlth Care & Nursing Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Profess Univ Zuyd, Fac Hlth & Technol, NL-6400 AN Heerlen, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Healthcare Studies, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[7] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Gen Practice, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[8] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care Caphri, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-8-332
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Falls are a major health threat to older community-living people, and initiatives to prevent falls should be a public health priority. We evaluated a Dutch version of a successful British fall prevention programme. Results of this Dutch study showed no effects on falls or daily functioning. In parallel to the effect evaluation, we carried out a detailed process evaluation to assess the feasibility of our multidisciplinary fall prevention programme. The present study reports on the results of this process evaluation. Methods: Our fall prevention programme comprised a medical and occupational-therapy assessment, resulting in recommendations and/or referrals to other services if indicated. We used self-administered questionnaires, structured telephone interviews, structured recording forms, structured face-to-face interviews and a plenary group discussion to collect data from participants allocated to the intervention group (n = 166) and from all practitioners who performed the assessments (n = 8). The following outcomes were assessed: the extent to which the multidisciplinary fall prevention programme was performed according to protocol, the nature of the recommendations and referrals provided to the participants, participants' self-reported compliance and participants' and practitioners' opinions about the programme. Results: Both participants and practitioners judged the programme to be feasible. The programme was largely performed according to protocol. The number of referrals and recommendations ensuing from the medical assessment was relatively small. Participants' self-reported compliance as regards contacting their GP to be informed of the recommendations and/or referrals was low to moderate. However, self-reported compliance with such referrals and recommendations was reasonable to good. A large majority of participants reported they had benefited from the programme. Conclusion: The results of the present study show that the programme was feasible for both practitioners and participants. Main factors that seem to be responsible for the lack of effectiveness are the relatively low number of referrals and recommendations ensuing from the medical assessments and participants' low compliance as regards contacting their GP about the results of the medical assessment. We do not recommend implementing the programme in its present form in regular care. Trial registration: ISRCTN64716113
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, J AM GERIATR SOC, V49, P664, DOI DOI 10.1046/J.1532-5415.2001.49115.X
[2]   The geriatric day hospital [J].
Black, DA .
AGE AND AGEING, 2005, 34 (05) :427-429
[3]   FALLS BY ELDERLY PEOPLE AT HOME - PREVALENCE AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS [J].
BLAKE, AJ ;
MORGAN, K ;
BENDALL, MJ ;
DALLOSSO, H ;
EBRAHIM, SBJ ;
ARIE, THD ;
FENTEM, PH ;
BASSEY, EJ .
AGE AND AGEING, 1988, 17 (06) :365-372
[4]  
Bloem BR, 2001, WIEN KLIN WOCHENSCHR, V113, P352
[5]   Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials [J].
Chang, JT ;
Morton, SC ;
Rubenstein, LZ ;
Mojica, WA ;
Maglione, M ;
Suttorp, MJ ;
Roth, EA ;
Shekelle, PG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441) :680-683
[6]   Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial [J].
Close, J ;
Ellis, M ;
Hooper, R ;
Glucksman, E ;
Jackson, S ;
Swift, C .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9147) :93-97
[7]   Patients with recurrent falls attending Accident & Emergency benefit from multifactorial intervention - a randomised controlled trial [J].
Davison, J ;
Bond, J ;
Dawson, P ;
Steen, IN ;
Kenny, RA .
AGE AND AGEING, 2005, 34 (02) :162-168
[8]  
Fuller GF, 2000, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V61, P2159
[9]   Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community [J].
Gillespie, Lesley D. ;
Robertson, M. Clare ;
Gillespie, William J. ;
Sherrington, Catherine ;
Gates, Simon ;
Clemson, Lindy M. ;
Lamb, Sarah E. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (09)
[10]   Lack of effectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall-prevention program in elderly people at risk: A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Hendriks, Marike R. C. ;
Bleijlevens, Michel H. C. ;
van Haastregt, Jolanda C. M. ;
Crebolder, Harry F. J. M. ;
Diederiks, Joseph P. M. ;
Evers, Silvia M. A. A. ;
Mulder, Wubbo J. ;
Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M. ;
van Rossum, Erik ;
Ruijgrok, Joop M. ;
Stalenhoef, Paul A. ;
van Eijk, Jacques Th. M. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2008, 56 (08) :1390-1397