Modeling the impact of food wastes on wastewater treatment plants

被引:15
|
作者
Kim, M. [1 ]
Nakhla, G. [1 ,2 ]
Keleman, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Chem & Biochem Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[3] Emerson Elect Co, 8000 West Florissant Ave, St Louis, MO 63136 USA
关键词
Food waste; Nutrient removal; Biogas; Simulation; Cost analysis; Wastewater treatment plant; CO-DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; CARBON SOURCE; DISPOSERS; FRACTIONATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.065
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Food waste (FW) enriched with readily biodegradable organics can enhance biological nutrient removal (BNR), and biogas production. This study conducted extensive wastewater treatment simulations using BioWin software to predict the impact of food waste on nutrient removal, biogas generation, and energy balance. A total of 114 scenarios were tested to simulate different treatment technologies i.e. conventional activated sludge, Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE), anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic (A2O), Bardenpho, and 2nd generation BNR technologies. The simulations also included sidestream treatment for nitrogen removal, as well as mainstream partial nitrification based on BNR. The results showed that FW addition enhanced nitrogen removal and decreased effluent nitrogen for BNR processes by 3.6-7.9 mg/L for MLE, 0.6-1.3 mg/L for A2O, and 1-2.3 mg/L for Bardenpho. In addition, FW addition decreased net operational cost by 26%-63% for BNR processes operating at mainstream conventional dissolved oxygen (DO) of 2 mg/L, 24%-78% for partial nitrification system, 29%-54% for sidestream, and 23%-76% for sidestream with mainstream partial nitrification process. The total net energy benefit considering both the net change in aeration energy and methane energy for a typical 37,854 m(3)/d or 10 MGD plant increased with FW addition by 3300-7900 kWh/d with a variation between BNR types, due to a substantial increase in methane production. Carbon diversion scenarios showed that the higher primary treatment efficiencies decreased the net operational cost and increased net energy gain.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 358
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MATHEMATICAL-MODELING AND ECONOMIC OPTIMIZATION OF WASTEWATER-TREATMENT PLANTS
    TYTECA, D
    SMEERS, Y
    NYNS, EJ
    ERICKSON, LE
    CRC CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, 1977, 8 (01): : 1 - 89
  • [32] Environmentally Friendly Technologies for Wastewater Treatment in Food Processing Plants: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Onofre Zapata-Mendoza, Prospero Cristhian
    Julian Berrios-Tauccaya, Oscar
    Amirpasha Tirado-Kulieva, Vicente
    Alberto Gonzales-Malca, Jhony
    Roberto Ricse-Reyes, David
    Amador Berrios-Zevallos, Andres
    Simon Seminario-Sanz, Roberto
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [33] Assessment of the Bulgarian Wastewater Treatment Plants' Impact on the Receiving Water Bodies
    Yotova, Galina
    Lazarova, Svetlana
    Kudlak, Blazej
    Zlateva, Boika
    Mihaylova, Veronika
    Wieczerzak, Monika
    Venelinov, Tony
    Tsakovski, Stefan
    MOLECULES, 2019, 24 (12):
  • [34] On the evaluation of the global impact of control strategies applied to wastewater treatment plants
    Barbu, Marian
    Vilanova, Ramon
    Meneses, Montse
    Santin, Ignacio
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 149 : 396 - 405
  • [35] Intergrated approach for microbiological impact assessment of public wastewater treatment plants
    Ostoich, Marco
    Aimo, Emilia
    Frate, Rita
    Vazzoler, Marina
    Stradella, Silvia
    Osti, Paolo
    CHEMISTRY AND ECOLOGY, 2007, 23 (01) : 43 - 62
  • [36] The impact of rainfall on flows and loadings at Georgia's wastewater treatment plants
    Mines, Richard O., Jr.
    Lackey, Laura W.
    Behrend, Glen H.
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2007, 179 (1-4): : 135 - 157
  • [37] The Impact of Rainfall on Flows and Loadings at Georgia’s Wastewater Treatment Plants
    Richard O. Mines
    Laura W. Lackey
    Glen H. Behrend
    Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2007, 179 : 135 - 157
  • [38] REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN SPAIN
    Luis Fuentes-Bargues, Jose
    ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ENGINEERING, 2018, 44 (04): : 23 - 41
  • [39] The impact of sludge return liquors on South African wastewater treatment plants
    Nsengiyuma, Olivier
    Coothen, Yuva
    Ikumi, David
    Naidoo, Kirshen
    WATER SA, 2021, 47 (01) : 106 - 112
  • [40] Biological treatment of hazardous wastes, sludges & wastewater
    Cheremisinoff, Paul N.
    Pollution Engineering, 1990, 22 (05) : 87 - 94