Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education

被引:361
作者
Kirschner, Paul A. [1 ]
van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ Netherlands, Ctr Learning Sci & Technol, NL-6419 AT Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Educ Dev & Res, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Profess Educ, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
INFORMATION-SEEKING; DECISION-MAKING; LEARNING STYLES; DIGITAL NATIVES; SELF-REGULATION; TASK SELECTION; SHARED CONTROL; STUDENTS; INSTRUCTION; WEB;
D O I
10.1080/00461520.2013.804395
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article takes a critical look at three pervasive urban legends in education about the nature of learners, learning, and teaching and looks at what educational and psychological research has to say about them. The three legends can be seen as variations on one central theme, namely, that it is the learner who knows best and that she or he should be the controlling force in her or his learning. The first legend is one of learners as digital natives who form a generation of students knowing by nature how to learn from new media, and for whom old media and methods used in teaching/learning no longer work. The second legend is the widespread belief that learners have specific learning styles and that education should be individualized to the extent that the pedagogy of teaching/learning is matched to the preferred style of the learner. The final legend is that learners ought to be seen as self-educators who should be given maximum control over what they are learning and their learning trajectory. It concludes with a possible reason why these legends have taken hold, are so pervasive, and are so difficult to eradicate.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 183
页数:15
相关论文
共 138 条
[1]   The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty-first century: exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners [J].
Anderman, Eric M. ;
Sinatra, Gale M. ;
Gray, DeLeon L. .
STUDIES IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2012, 48 (01) :89-117
[2]   BELIEF PERSEVERANCE, BIASED ASSIMILATION, AND COVARIATION DETECTION - THE EFFECTS OF HYPOTHETICAL SOCIAL THEORIES AND NEW DATA [J].
ANDERSON, CA ;
KELLAM, KL .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1992, 18 (05) :555-565
[3]  
ANDERSON S, 2009, NEW YORK MAG, V42, P28
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HOMO ZAPPIENS GROWIN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511816819.016, 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.017, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139547369]
[6]  
[Anonymous], INFORM BEHAV RES FUT
[7]  
[Anonymous], UCLA TODAY 1019
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Training Complex Cognitive Skills
[9]  
[Anonymous], TIME
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, TECHNOL PEDAGOG EDUC, DOI DOI 10.1080/1475939X.2010.534867