Why Are Protestants More Prosocial Than Catholics? A Comparative Study Among Orthodox Dutch Believers

被引:20
作者
van Elk, Michiel [1 ,2 ]
Rutjens, Bastiaan T. [1 ,2 ]
van Harreveld, Frenk [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129B,Bldg G,Room 2-31, NL-1001 NK Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Brain & Cognit Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
SELF-ESTEEM; RELIGION; GOD; MORALITY; AGE; AUTHORITARIAN; MOTIVATION; EVOLUTION; PREDICT; IMAGE;
D O I
10.1080/10508619.2017.1245023
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study sheds light on the contentious relation between religions and prosociality by comparing self-reported altruistic and prosocial behavior among a group of Catholic and Protestant believers. We found that denomination was strongly related to strength of religious beliefs, afterlife beliefs, free-will beliefs, and self-reported prosocial behavior. Denominational differences between Catholics and Protestants in self-reported prosociality were mediated by a stronger endorsement of religious beliefs and belief in predestination but were not related to motivational measures of self-esteem. We also found that the perceived prosociality (i.e., the extent to which others were perceived as being prosocial) was higher for one's religious ingroup than one's outgroup, and this effect was stronger for Catholics than Protestants. These novel findings provide an integrated perspective on how religious denominations shape prosocial attitudes and behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 81
页数:17
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Ritual, emotion, and sacred symbols - The evolution of religion as an adaptive complex [J].
Alcorta, CS ;
Sosis, R .
HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE, 2005, 16 (04) :323-359
[2]   PERSONAL CONTACT, INDIVIDUATION, AND THE BETTER-THAN-AVERAGE EFFECT [J].
ALICKE, MD ;
KLOTZ, ML ;
BREITENBECHER, DL ;
YURAK, TJ ;
VREDENBURG, DS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 68 (05) :804-825
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SCALE DEV THEORY APP
[4]   INCLUSION OF OTHER IN THE SELF SCALE AND THE STRUCTURE OF INTERPERSONAL CLOSENESS [J].
ARON, A ;
ARON, EN ;
SMOLLAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (04) :596-612
[5]   Beliefs about God, the afterlife and morality support the role of supernatural policing in human cooperation [J].
Atkinson, Quentin D. ;
Bourrat, Pierrick .
EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 32 (01) :41-49
[6]   Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior? [J].
Baumeister, Roy F. ;
Vohs, Kathleen D. ;
Funder, David C. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 2 (04) :396-403
[7]   Prosocial Benefits of Feeling Free: Disbelief in Free Will Increases Aggression and Reduces Helpfulness [J].
Baumeister, Roy F. ;
Masicampo, E. J. ;
DeWall, C. Nathan .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2009, 35 (02) :260-268
[8]  
Bekkers R, 2008, REV RELIG RES, V50, P74
[9]   Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving Part One: Religion, education, age and socialisation [J].
Bekkers, Rene ;
Wiepking, Pamala .
VOLUNTARY SECTOR REVIEW, 2011, 2 (03) :337-365
[10]   A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving [J].
Bekkers, Rene ;
Wiepking, Pamala .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2011, 40 (05) :924-973