A Guide to Measuring and Interpreting Attribute Importance

被引:96
作者
Gonzalez, Juan Marcos [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, 200 Morris St, Durham, NC 27701 USA
关键词
DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-019-00360-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Stated-preference (SP) methods, such as discrete-choice experiments (DCE) and best-worst scaling (BWS), have increasingly been used to measure preferences for attributes of medical interventions. Preference information is commonly characterized using attribute importance. However, attribute importance measures can vary in value and interpretation depending on the method used to elicit preferences, the specific contextof the questions, and the approach used to normalize attributeeffects. This variationcomplicates the interpretation ofpreference resultsandthe comparability of results across subgroups in a sample. This article highlightsthe potentialconsequences of ignoring variations in attribute importance measures, and makes the case for reportingmore clearly how these measures are obtained andcalculated.Transparency inthecalculations canclarify what conclusions aresupported by the results, and helpmake more accurate and meaningful comparisons across subsamples.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 295
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Beusterien K., 2017, J CANC THER, V8, P37, DOI DOI 10.4236/JCT.2017.81004
[2]  
Bryan K.O., 2013, SAWTOOTH SOFTWARE RE
[3]   Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature [J].
Clark, Michael D. ;
Determann, Domino ;
Petrou, Stavros ;
Moro, Domenico ;
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (09) :883-902
[4]   Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature [J].
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. ;
Ryan, Mandy ;
Gerard, Karen .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 (02) :145-172
[5]   Best-worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it [J].
Flynn, Terry N. ;
Louviere, Jordan J. ;
Peters, Tim J. ;
Coast, Joanna .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 26 (01) :171-189
[6]   A discrete-choice experiment of United Kingdom patients′ willingness to risk adverse events for improved function and pain control in osteoarthritis [J].
Hauber, A. B. ;
Arden, N. K. ;
Mohamed, A. F. ;
Johnson, F. R. ;
Peloso, P. M. ;
Watson, D. J. ;
Mavros, P. ;
Gammaitoni, A. ;
Sen, S. S. ;
Taylor, S. D. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2013, 21 (02) :289-297
[7]  
Hauber AB, 2016, VALUE HEALTH, V19, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004
[8]   Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force [J].
Johnson, F. Reed ;
Lancsar, Emily ;
Marshall, Deborah ;
Kilambi, Vikram ;
Muehlbacher, Axel ;
Regier, Dean A. ;
Bresnahan, Brian W. ;
Kanninen, Barbara ;
Bridges, John F. P. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (01) :3-13
[9]   Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments [J].
Lancsar, Emily ;
Louviere, Jordan ;
Flynn, Terry .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2007, 64 (08) :1738-1753
[10]   Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application [J].
Lancsar, Emily ;
Louviere, Jordan ;
Donaldson, Cam ;
Currie, Gillian ;
Burgess, Leonie .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 76 :74-82