Indications for intraoperative frozen section in robot assisted radical prostatectomy: a pilot study

被引:0
|
作者
Akin, Y. [1 ]
Avci, E. [2 ]
Gulmez, H. [3 ]
Akand, M. [4 ]
Ciftcioglu, M. Akif [5 ]
Bassorgun, I. [5 ]
Erdogru, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Erzincan Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Erzincan, Turkey
[2] Mem Istanbul Atasehir Hosp, Dept Minimally Invas & Robot Surg Ctr, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Baskent Univ, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, TR-06490 Ankara, Turkey
[4] Selcuklu Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Konya, Turkey
[5] Akdeniz Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, TR-07058 Antalya, Turkey
关键词
Frozen section; laparoscopy; pathology; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; LEARNING-CURVE; EXPERIENCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate indications for intraoperative frozen section (IFS) during robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) in our series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospectively documented 80 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RALRP were evaluated between June 2010 and July 2012. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether systematically IFS was performed or not. Group 1 (n=66) consisted of patients on whom systematic IFS was performed, Group 2 (n=14) consisted of patients on whom IFS was not performed. All recorded data evaluated and statistical analyses were performed for determining indications and predictive factors for IFS during RALRP. All patients were operated by single surgeon and IFS, pathological assessments were performed by experienced uro-pathologist. Statistical significant p value was p < 0.05. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 15 +/- 6 (25-4) months. Pre-operative prostate volume in transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) was statistically higher in Group 1 than Group 2 (p = 0.037). The other parameters were statistically similar in both groups. According to outcomes of our study IFS was a dependent factor for positive surgical margin. Additionally, the cut off value of prostate volume in TRUS for IFS was 55.5 cc for IFS. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative measured prostate volume in TRUS may be an indicator of IFS. Therefore, more accurate information may be given to patients with prostate cancer (Pca) before RALRP by using preoperative prostate volume in TRUS.
引用
收藏
页码:2523 / 2529
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Use of Augmented Reality to Guide the Intraoperative Frozen Section During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Chessa, Francesco
    Angiolini, Andrea
    Cercenelli, Laura
    Lodi, Simone
    Bortolani, Barbara
    Molinaroli, Enrico
    Casablanca, Carlo
    Droghetti, Matteo
    Gaudiano, Caterina
    Mottaran, Angelo
    Porreca, Angelo
    Golfieri, Rita
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Giunchi, Francesca
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Piazza, Pietro
    Puliatti, Stefano
    Diciotti, Stefano
    Marcelli, Emanuela
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (04) : 480 - 488
  • [2] EVOLUTION OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Orvieto, M. A.
    Patel, V. R.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 98 (02) : 76 - 88
  • [3] Intraoperative Frozen Section for Margin Evaluation During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review
    Dinneen, Eoin P.
    Van Der Slot, Michelle
    Adasonla, Kelvin
    Tan, Jin
    Grierson, Jack
    Haider, Aiman
    Freeman, Alex
    Oakley, Neil
    Shaw, Greg
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (04): : 664 - 673
  • [4] Frozen section evaluation of margins in radical prostatectomy specimens: a contemporary study and literature review
    Nunez, Amberly L.
    Giannico, Giovanna A.
    Mukhtar, Faisal
    Dailey, Virginia
    El-Galley, Rizk
    Hameed, Omar
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2016, 24 : 11 - 18
  • [5] Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 94 - 99
  • [6] Impact of frozen section on long-term outcomes in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Kinnear, Ned
    Fonseca, Paul Cotter
    Ogbechie, Catherine
    Adam, Sana
    Haidar, Omar
    Jinaraj, Aromal
    O'Callaghan, Michael
    Agarwal, Samita
    Lane, Tim
    Vasdev, Nikhil
    Adshead, James
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 134 (04) : 608 - 614
  • [7] Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Indications, Technique and Outcomes
    Semerjian, Alice
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 18 (06)
  • [8] Evaluation of margins during radical prostatectomy: confocal microscopy vs frozen section analysis
    Musi, Gennaro
    Mistretta, Francesco A.
    Ivanova, Mariia
    de Cobelli, Ottavio
    Bellin, Andrea
    Vago, Gianluca Gaetano
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    Pala, Oriana
    Lepanto, Daniela
    Bottero, Danilo
    Piccinelli, Mattia Luca
    Tallini, Matteo
    Marvaso, Giulia
    Ferro, Matteo
    Petralia, Giuseppe
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    Fusco, Nicola
    Renne, Giuseppe
    Luzzago, Stefano
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 134 (05) : 773 - 780
  • [9] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Sun, Maxine
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (20) : 2767 - 2773
  • [10] Comparison of the initial robot-assisted radical prostatectomy results with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Agreda, Fernando
    Raventos, Carles
    Planos, Jacques
    Trilla, Enrique
    Morote, Juan
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2014, 67 (02): : 185 - 190