Does soil compaction change soil shrinkage behaviour?

被引:33
|
作者
Peng, X. [1 ]
Zhang, Z. B. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, L. L. [1 ,2 ]
Gan, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil Sci, State Key Lab Soil & Sustainable Agr, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Soil compaction; Soil shrinkage; Soil structure; Structural pores; Textural pores; CURVE; CONSEQUENCES; DEFORMATION; POROSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.still.2012.04.001
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil shrinkage and soil compaction represent the dynamics of soil structure with the hydraulic and mechanical stress, respectively, but they have different effects on the change of pores. Soil compaction may reduce the volume of structural pores considerably, but most of textural pores are kept no change. In the contrast, soil shrinkage is mainly contributed by textural pores rather than by structural pores. Thus, we hypothesized that soil compaction cannot modify soil shrinkage behaviour significantly. Our objective was to define the relationship between soil shrinkage and soil compaction. Soil shrinkage curves were measured from the plough layer and plough pan of three paddy soils, indicating non-compacted and compacted samples. Additional 19 sets of shrinkage data from 7 soils repacked by various compaction stresses were collected from four individual studies. At a given soil type, our results presented that the soil shrinkage curves were parallel between different intensities of soil compaction. Their slopes of soil shrinkage curve were kept identical as well. According to the similarity of them, the shrinkage behaviour of the highly compacted soil could be estimated using the parameters of the slightly compacted soil shrinkage with a good performance (r > 0.95). This work verifies our hypothesis that soil shrinkage behaviour is independent of soil compaction. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 95
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Investigating the hydraulic conductivity and soil characteristics under compaction and soil texture and performances as landfill liner
    Bahmani, Omid
    Bayram, Mansure
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 11 (16)
  • [42] Measuring dynamic changes of soil porosity during compaction
    Fu, Yongwei
    Tian, Zhengchao
    Amoozegar, Aziz
    Heitman, Josh
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2019, 193 : 114 - 121
  • [43] Vibrational Motion of Soil-Compaction Tools in Agriculture
    Djurayev A.D.
    Alimukhamedov S.P.
    Turdaliev V.M.
    Sheraliev I.I.
    Sherboev M.
    Russian Engineering Research, 2022, 42 (10) : 969 - 971
  • [44] Soil Shrinkage: Underlying Mechanisms Revealed by Intergranular Stress
    Ma, Tiantian
    Yu, Haiwen
    Chen, Pan
    Wei, Changfu
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 150 (03)
  • [45] Soil compaction due to heavy forest traffic: measurements and simulations using an analytical soil compaction model
    Goutal, N.
    Keller, T.
    Defossez, P.
    Ranger, J.
    ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2013, 70 (05) : 545 - 556
  • [46] Experimental study of soil compaction effects on GPR signals
    Wang Ping
    Hu Zhenqi
    Zhao Yanling
    Li Xinju
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 126 : 128 - 137
  • [47] Soil compaction due to heavy forest traffic: measurements and simulations using an analytical soil compaction model
    N. Goutal
    T. Keller
    P. Défossez
    J. Ranger
    Annals of Forest Science, 2013, 70 : 545 - 556
  • [48] Under pressure: elucidating soil compaction and its effect on soil functions
    Frene, Juan P.
    Pandey, Bipin K.
    Castrillo, Gabriel
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2024, 502 (1-2) : 267 - 278
  • [49] INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF SOIL COMPACTION IN COTTON
    Kulkarni, S. S.
    Bajwa, S. G.
    Huitink, G.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2010, 53 (03) : 667 - 674
  • [50] Root competition, not soil compaction, restricts access to soil resources for aspen on a reclaimed mine soil
    Bockstette, Simon W.
    Pinno, Bradley D.
    Dyck, Miles F.
    Landhausser, Simon M.
    BOTANY, 2017, 95 (07) : 385 - 395