Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes in Redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve

被引:6
作者
Hecht, Sebastien [1 ]
Zenses, Anne-Sophie [1 ]
Bernard, Jeremy [1 ]
Tastet, Lionel [1 ]
Cote, Nancy [1 ]
Guimaraes, Leonardo de Freitas Campos [1 ]
Paradis, Jean-Michel [1 ]
Beaudoin, Jonathan [1 ]
O'Connor, Kim [1 ]
Bernier, Mathieu [1 ]
Dumont, Eric [1 ]
Kalavrouziotis, Dimitri [1 ]
Delarochelliere, Robert [1 ]
Mohammadi, Siamak [1 ]
Clavel, Marie-Annick [1 ]
Rodes-Cabau, Josep [1 ]
Salaun, Erwan [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Laval Univ, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Univ Laval, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
来源
STRUCTURAL HEART-THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM | 2022年 / 6卷 / 06期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Aortic bioprosthesis; Redo; -surgery; Structural valve deterioration; Transcatheter valve -in -valve; PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH; END-POINT DEFINITIONS; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN SOCIETY; IMPLANTATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; RECOMMENDATIONS; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.shj.2022.100106
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to redo-surgical aortic valve replacement (Redo-SAVR) for the treatment of failed surgical aortic bioprostheses. However, the benefit of ViV-TAVR compared with Redo-SAVR remains debated with regard to short-term hemodynamic results and short-and long-term clinical outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to compare short-term hemodynamic performance and long-term clinical outcomes of ViV-TAVR vs. Redo-SAVR in patients treated for surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve failure. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data prospectively collected in 184 patients who underwent Redo-SAVR or ViV-TAVR. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and after the procedure and analyzed in an echocardiography core laboratory using the new Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. An inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to compare the outcomes between both procedures. Results: ViV-TAVR showed lower rate of intended hemodynamic performance (39.2% vs. 67.7%, p < 0.001) at 30 days, which was essentially driven by a higher rate (56.2% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.001) of high residual gradient (mean transvalvular gradient >= 20 mm Hg). Despite a trend for higher 30-day mortality in the Redo-SAVR vs. ViV-TAVR group (8.7% vs. 2.5%, odds ratio [95% CI]: 3.70 [0.77-17.6]; p = 0.10), the long-term mortality was significantly lower (24.2% vs. 50.1% at 8 years; hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.48 [0.26-0.91]; p = 0.03) in the Redo-SAVR group. After inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, Redo-SAVR remained significantly associated with reduced long-term mortality compared with ViV-TAVR (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.32 [0.22-0.46]; p < 0.001). Conclusions: ViV-TAVR was associated with a lower rate of intended hemodynamic performance and numerically lower mortality at 30 days but higher rates of long-term mortality compared with Redo-SAVR.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture to Facilitate Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [J].
Sreedharan, Subhashaan ;
Sellers, Stephanie L. ;
Ihdayhid, Abdul Rahman ;
Landes, Uri ;
Blanke, Philipp ;
Allen, Keith B. ;
Chhatriwalla, Adnan K. ;
Pibarot, Philippe ;
Wood, David A. ;
Webb, John G. ;
Leipsic, Jonathon A. ;
Sathananthan, Janarthanan .
STRUCTURAL HEART-THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM, 2021, 5 (01) :24-38
[42]   Valve-in-valve vs. repeat surgical aortic valve replacement: a new match but the game is not over! [J].
Iung, Bernard ;
Wendler, Olaf .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (29) :2756-2758
[43]   Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Mixed Aortic Valve Disease [J].
Chahine, Johnny ;
Kadri, Amer N. ;
Gajulapalli, Rama D. ;
Krishnaswamy, Amar ;
Mick, Stephanie ;
Perez, Oscar ;
Lak, Hassan ;
Nair, Raunak M. ;
Montane, Bryce ;
Tak, James ;
Tuzcu, E. Murat ;
Griffin, Brian ;
Svensson, Lars G. ;
Harb, Serge C. ;
Kapadia, Samir R. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (22) :2299-2306
[44]   Diastolic dysfunction and clinical outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with atypical aortic valve stenosis [J].
Belin, Rashad J. ;
Desa, Travis B. ;
Wroblewski, Igor ;
Joyce, Cara ;
Perez-Tamayo, Anthony ;
Schwartz, Jeffrey ;
Steen, Lowell H. ;
Lopez, John J. ;
Lewis, Bruce E. ;
Leya, Ferdinand S. ;
Tuchek, Michael ;
Bakhos, Mamdouh ;
Mathew, Verghese .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (04) :318-326
[45]   Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus surgical redo aortic root replacement in patients with degenerated freestyle aortic bioprosthesis [J].
Vukadinovikj, Andrijana ;
Baumgartner, Eva ;
Bohmann, Katja ;
Harter, Denise ;
Wimmer-Greinecker, Gerhard ;
Burgdorf, Christof .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 97 (07) :1472-1478
[46]   Recent Outcomes of Surgical Redo Aortic Valve Replacement in Prosthetic Valve Failure [J].
Kang, Yoonjin ;
Soehartono, Nazla Amanda ;
Choi, Jae Woong ;
Kim, Kyung Hwan ;
Hwang, Ho Young ;
Kim, Joon Bum ;
Kim, Hong Rae ;
Lee, Seung Hyun ;
Cho, Yang Hyun .
THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2025, 73 (04) :279-287
[47]   Outcomes of Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement According to the Initial and Subsequent Valve Type [J].
Landes, Uri ;
Richter, Ilan ;
Danenberg, Haim ;
Kornowski, Ran ;
Sathananthan, Janarthanan ;
De Backer, Ole ;
Sondergaard, Lars ;
Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed ;
Yoon, Sung-Han ;
Makkar, Raj R. ;
Thiele, Holger ;
Kim, Won-Keun ;
Hamm, Christian ;
Buzzatti, Nicola ;
Montorfano, Matteo ;
Ludwig, Sebastian ;
Schofer, Niklas ;
Voigtlaender, Lisa ;
Guerrero, Mayra ;
El Sabbagh, Abdallah ;
Rodes-Cabau, Josep ;
Mesnier, Jules ;
Okuno, Taishi ;
Pilgrim, Thomas ;
Fiorina, Claudia ;
Colombo, Antonio ;
Mangieri, Antonio ;
Eltchaninoff, Helene ;
Nombela-Franco, Luis ;
Van Wiechen, Maarten P. H. ;
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M. ;
Tchetche, Didier ;
Schoels, Wolfgang H. ;
Kullmer, Matthias ;
Barbanti, Marco ;
Tamburino, Corrado ;
Sinning, Jan-Malte ;
Al-Kassou, Baravan ;
Perlman, Gidon Y. ;
Ielasi, Alfonso ;
Fraccaro, Chiara ;
Tarantini, Giuseppe ;
De Marco, Federico ;
Witberg, Guy ;
Redwood, Simon R. ;
Lisko, John C. ;
Babaliaros, Vasilis C. ;
Laine, Mika ;
Nerla, Roberto ;
Finkelstein, Ariel .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (15) :1543-1554
[48]   Meta-Analysis Comparing Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Mitral Valve Replacement in Degenerated Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve [J].
Ismayl, Mahmoud ;
Abbasi, Muhannad Aboud ;
Mostafa, Mostafa Reda ;
Aboeata, Ahmed ;
Vora, Amit N. ;
Ben-Dor, Itsik ;
Anavekar, Nandan S. ;
Goldsweig, Andrew M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 189 :98-107
[49]   Multicenter experience with valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with primary, native valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement [J].
Robich, Michael P. ;
Iribarne, Alexander ;
Butzel, David ;
DiScipio, Anthony W. ;
Dauerman, Harold L. ;
Leavitt, Bruce J. ;
DeSimone, Joseph P. ;
Coylewright, Megan ;
Flynn, James M. ;
Westbrook, Benjamin M. ;
Ver Lee, Peter N. ;
Zaky, Mina ;
Quinn, Reed ;
Malenka, David J. .
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (12) :4382-4388
[50]   Hemodynamic Valve Deterioration After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Outcomes [J].
Alaour, Bashir ;
Tomii, Daijiro ;
Nakase, Masaaki ;
Heg, Dik ;
Stortecky, Stefan ;
Lanz, Jonas ;
Samim, Daryoush ;
Reineke, David ;
Praz, Fabien ;
Windecker, Stephan ;
Pilgrim, Thomas .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 18 (01) :72-85