Striking the Balance between Nutrient Removal, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Receiving Water Quality, and Costs

被引:21
作者
Falk, Michael W. [1 ]
Reardon, David J. [1 ]
Neethling, J. B. [1 ]
Clark, David L. [2 ]
Pramanik, Amit [3 ]
机构
[1] HDR Engn, Folsom, CA 95630 USA
[2] HDR Engn, Boise, ID 83706 USA
[3] Water Environm Res Fdn, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
关键词
greenhouse gas emissions; nutrients; nitrogen; phosphorus; sustainability; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE PROCESSES; SOLIDS RETENTION TIME; WASTE-WATER;
D O I
10.2175/106143013X13807328848379
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This Water Environment Research Foundation study considered the relationship between varying nutrient-removal levels at wastewater treatment plants, greenhouse gas emissions, receiving water quality (measured by potential algal production), and costs. The effluent nutrient concentrations required by some U.S. permits are very low, approaching the technology-best-achievable performance. This study evaluated five different treatment levels at a nominal 40 ML/d (10 mgd) flow. Greenhouse gas emissions and costs increase gradually up to the technologies' best-achievable performance, after which they increase exponentially. The gradual increase is attributed to additional biological treatment facilities, increased energy and chemical use, and additional tertiary nitrogen and phosphorus removal processes. Within the limited focus of this study, the evaluation shows that a point of diminishing return is reached as nutrient-removal objectives approach the technology-best-achievable performance, where greenhouse gas emissions and cost of treatment increases rapidly while the potential for algal growth reduce marginally.
引用
收藏
页码:2307 / 2316
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Ahn Ji-Young, 2009, Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences, V1, P1
[2]   N2O Emissions from Activated Sludge Processes, 2008-2009: Results of a National Monitoring Survey in the United States [J].
Ahn, Joon Ho ;
Kim, Sungpyo ;
Park, Hongkeun ;
Rahm, Brian ;
Pagilla, Krishna ;
Chandran, Kartik .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (12) :4505-4511
[3]  
[Anonymous], MEMBR CONC DISP PRAC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 430R08005 US EPA
[5]  
Beck M. B., 2011, CITIES FORCES GOOD E, P21
[6]  
Biswas W.K., 2009, Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, V56, P369
[7]  
Bott C., 2011, NUTR1R06H WERF RES P
[8]   Greenhouse gas production: A comparison between aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment technology [J].
Cakir, FY ;
Stenstrom, MK .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (17) :4197-4203
[9]  
California Climate Action Registry, 2008, GEN REP PROT VERS 1
[10]   The Relationship Between Mixed-Liquor Particle Size and Solids Retention Time in the Activated Sludge Process [J].
Chan, Licheng ;
Leu, Shao-Yuan ;
Rosso, Diego ;
Stenstrom, Michael K. .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2011, 83 (12) :2178-2186