Psychological Behavior of Frontline Medical Staff in the Use of Preventive Medication for COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Xiaoyan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yuxi [3 ]
Tang, Li [2 ]
Deng, Lu [2 ]
Zhao, Yuxin [1 ]
Zhao, Xianmei [2 ,4 ]
Xu, Huilan [1 ]
Zeng, Ming [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social Med & Hlth Management, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Clin Nursing, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Toxicol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Hlth Management Ctr, Changsha, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
COVID-19; preventive medication; combined Chinese and Western medicine treatment; psychological; medical staff in fighting against COVID-19;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02104
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Purpose To understand the current pandemic, levels of anxiety in frontline staff, and whether they have been using medication to prevent COVID-19. Methods Between January 10 and March 10, 2020, 290 frontline staff completed a questionnaire incorporating the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 (GAD-7) to indicate their psychological behavior in the use of preventive medication. Results Of those who participated in the study, 77.6% used preventive medication, with 47.5, 40.9, and 11.6% using these as part of routine preventive treatment, to fight infection after it was contracted, and after occupational exposure, respectively. There was a statistically significant relationship between the anxiety scale scores and the frequency of medication use (P< 0.05). Comparative analyses revealed that the scores of those in the group taking medication after occupational exposure (to respiratory and blood-borne pathogens) were significantly different from other groups. The proportion of participants choosing Western medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, and integrated Chinese and Western medicine was 24.4, 28.0, and 47.6%, respectively. Additionally, the relationship between the anxiety scale scores and the three types of medication was statistically significant (P< 0.05), as was the difference between Western medicine and other groups. According to Multinomial logistic regression based on the adjustment to gender, age, educational level, marital status, current workplace, and profession, participants with moderate to severe anxiety, had higher odds (OR= 10.331, 95%CI:1.453-73.429) of using Western medicine than participants with no anxiety. Participants with moderate anxiety were 6.399 times more likely to use an integrated combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine compared to those with no anxiety (OR= 6.399, 95%CI:1.007-40.658). Furthermore, those with mild anxiety were 2.656 times more likely to use integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine than those with no anxiety (OR= 2.657, 95%CI:1.075-6.570). The probability that frontline medical staff with moderate anxiety took preventive medication after occupational exposure to COVID-19 was 8.066 times (OR= 8.066, 95%CI:1.043-62.353) higher than that of staff without anxiety. Discussion This study revealed that there was more anxiety among frontline medical staff who took medication after unexpected occupational exposure. There was less anxiety among those using an integrated course of Chinese and Western medicine than Western medicine alone. It was also observed that anxiety affects the types and frequency of the preventive medication taken. Frontline medical staff who suffer from anxiety are also more likely to use medication to prevent COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Dental Graduates: A Cross-Sectional Study
    El-Din, Mai Salah
    Alhazmi, Rahaf M.
    Moussa, Rania
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [22] Psychological Impact of COVID-19, Isolation, and Quarantine: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Jassim, Ghufran
    Jameel, Mariam
    Brennan, Edwina
    Yusuf, Manaf
    Hasan, Nebras
    Alwatani, Yusuf
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2021, 17 : 1413 - 1421
  • [23] Physical and Psychosocial Responses to COVID-19 in Chinese Frontline Nurses A Cross-Sectional Study
    Zhang, Ping
    Gao, Chunhai
    Torres, Joseph
    Ma, Xueyi
    Xu, Man
    Wang, Lu
    Qu, Xi
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL NURSING AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, 2021, 59 (09) : 30 - 37
  • [24] Preventive measures against the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: A cross-sectional study
    Carlos Ibarrola-Pena, Juan
    Jose Barbosa-Camacho, Francisco
    Lorelei Almanza-Mena, Yolanda
    Matias Chejfec-Ciociano, Jonathan
    Alberto Reyes-Elizalde, Emilio
    Moramay Romero-Limon, Olaya
    Zaragoza-Organista, Rafael
    Cervantes-Perez, Enrique
    Hector Sapien-Fernandez, Jose
    Aldo Guzman-Barba, Jose
    Flores-Becerril, Paola
    Ochoa-Rodriguez, Itzel
    Najar-Hinojosa, Rodrigo
    Estefania Cueto-Valadez, Andrea
    Abigail Cueto-Valadez, Tania
    Lopez-Zendejas, Martin
    Fuentes-Orozco, Clotilde
    Cervantes-Guevara, Gabino
    Carlos Miranda-Ackerman, Roberto
    Gonzalez-Ojeda, Alejandro
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [25] Attitudes towards COVID-19 preventive measures: an Italian cross-sectional study
    Scampoli, P.
    Di Giovanni, P.
    Cedrone, F.
    D'Addezio, M.
    Di Martino, G.
    Meo, F.
    Staniscia, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 31 : 373 - 373
  • [26] COVID-19 Prevalence, Risk Perceptions, and Preventive Behavior in Asymptomatic Latino Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Karout, Lina
    Serwat, Ayna
    El Mais, Huda
    Kassab, Mohamad
    Khalid, Fatima
    Mercedes, Brisandi Ruiz
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [27] COVID-19 and the Mental Health of Frontline Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study in Southwestern Iran
    Bahramnejad, Ali
    Ahmadi, Alireza
    Moghadam, Touba Narimani
    Zarei, Zahra
    Fatahi-Asl, Jaffar
    Yadegarfar, Ghasem
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (04)
  • [28] Emotional impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the nursing staff: a cross-sectional study
    Guerra, Clara Lucas
    REVISTA ROL DE ENFERMERIA, 2023, 46 (7-8): : 19 - 27
  • [29] Psychological distress and related factors regarding COVID-19 among the ancillary hospital staff: A cross-sectional study
    Goel, Kapil
    Singh, Gurmeet
    Arora, Yogesh
    Goel, Parul
    Aggarwal, Arun Kumar
    Sen, Arunima
    Kumar, Krishan
    Bhogal, Ranjitpal Singh
    Thakur, J. S.
    Singh, Amarjeet
    Sharma, Nikita
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2023, 12 (04) : 694 - 700
  • [30] COVID-19 and Its Psychological Impacts on Healthcare Staff - A Multi-Centric Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
    Shahid, Hafsa
    Haider, Mobeen Z.
    Taqi, Muhammad
    Gulzar, Adnan
    Zamani, Zarlakhta
    Fatima, Tehreem
    Khalid, Yousra
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Nadeem, Hafiza A.
    Anwer, Faiz
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (11)