Multicenter Evaluation of the Verigene Clostridium difficile Nucleic Acid Assay

被引:24
作者
Carroll, Karen C. [1 ,2 ]
Buchan, Blake W. [3 ]
Tan, Sokha [2 ]
Stamper, Paul D. [1 ]
Riebe, Katherine M. [3 ]
Pancholi, Preeti [4 ]
Kelly, Cheryl [4 ]
Rao, Arundhati [5 ]
Fader, Robert [5 ]
Cavagnolo, Robert [6 ]
Watson, Wendy [6 ]
Goering, Richard V. [7 ]
Trevino, Ernest A. [8 ]
Weissfeld, Alice S. [8 ]
Ledeboer, Nathan A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Med Microbiol Lab, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dynacare Labs, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Scott & White Hosp, Temple, TX USA
[6] Medfusion, Lewisville, TX USA
[7] Creighton Univ, Med Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
[8] Microbiol Specialists, Houston, TX USA
关键词
REAL-TIME PCR; CLINICAL-SAMPLES; STRAIN TYPE; INFECTION; FIDAXOMICIN; VANCOMYCIN; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01690-13
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The Verigene Clostridium difficile Nucleic Acid test (Verigene CDF test) (Nanosphere, Northbrook, IL) is a multiplex qualitative PCR assay that utilizes a nanoparticle-based array hybridization method to detect C. difficile tcdA and tcdB in fecal specimens. In addition, the assay detects binary toxin gene sequences and the single base pair deletion at nucleotide 117 (Delta 117) in tcdC to provide a presumptive identification of the epidemic strain 027/NAP1/BI (referred to here as ribotype 027). This study compared the Verigene CDF test with anaerobic direct and enriched toxigenic culture on stool specimens from symptomatic patients among five geographically diverse laboratories within the United States. The Verigene CDF test was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the reference methods performed by a central laboratory included direct culture onto cycloserine cefoxitin fructose agar (CCFA) and enriched culture using cycloserine cefoxitin mannitol broth with taurocholate and lysozyme. Recovered isolates were identified as C. difficile using gas liquid chromatography and were tested for toxin using a cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay. Strains belonging to ribotype 027 were determined by PCR ribotyping and bidirectional sequencing for Delta 117 in tcdC. A total of 1,875 specimens were evaluable. Of these, 275 specimens (14.7%) were culture positive by either direct or enriched culture methods. Compared to direct culture alone, the overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the Verigene CDF test were 98.7%, 87.5%, 42%, and 99.9%, respectively. Compared to combined direct and enriched culture results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of the Verigene CDF test were 90.9%, 92.5%, 67.6%, and 98.3%, respectively. Of the 250 concordantly culture-positive specimens, 59 (23.6%) were flagged as "hypervirulent"; 53 were confirmed as ribotype 027, and all 59 possessed Delta 117 in tcdC. Time to results was approximately 2.5 h per specimen. The Verigene CDF test is a novel nucleic acid microarray that reliably detects both C. difficile toxins A and B in unformed stool specimens and appears to adequately identify ribotype 027 isolates.
引用
收藏
页码:4120 / 4125
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infection (ARHAI), 2012, UPD GUID DIAGN REP C
  • [2] Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in Feces by real-time PCR
    Bélanger, SD
    Boissinot, M
    Clairoux, N
    Picard, FJ
    Bergeron, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (02) : 730 - 734
  • [3] Consequences of Clostridium difficile infection: understanding the healthcare burden
    Bouza, E.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2012, 18 : 5 - 12
  • [4] Tests for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: The next generation
    Carroll, Karen C.
    [J]. ANAEROBE, 2011, 17 (04) : 170 - 174
  • [5] Biology of Clostridium difficile: Implications for Epidemiology and Diagnosis
    Carroll, Karen C.
    Bartlett, John G.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, VOL 65, 2011, 65 : 501 - 521
  • [6] Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults: 2010 Update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)
    Cohen, Stuart H.
    Gerding, Dale N.
    Johnson, Stuart
    Kelly, Ciaran P.
    Loo, Vivian G.
    McDonald, L. Clifford
    Pepin, Jacques
    Wilcox, Mark H.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 31 (05) : 431 - 455
  • [7] Fidaxomicin Versus Vancomycin for Clostridium difficile Infection: Meta-analysis of Pivotal Randomized Controlled Trials
    Crook, Derrick W.
    Walker, A. Sarah
    Kean, Yin
    Weiss, Karl
    Cornely, Oliver A.
    Miller, Mark A.
    Esposito, Roberto
    Louie, Thomas J.
    Stoesser, Nicole E.
    Young, Bernadette C.
    Angus, Brian J.
    Gorbach, Sherwood L.
    Peto, Timothy E. A.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 55 : S93 - S103
  • [8] Relapse Versus Reinfection: Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment With Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin
    Figueroa, Iris
    Johnson, Stuart
    Sambol, Susan P.
    Goldstein, Ellie J. C.
    Citron, Diane M.
    Gerding, Dale N.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 55 : S104 - S109
  • [9] Economic healthcare costs of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review
    Ghantoji, S. S.
    Sail, K.
    Lairson, D. R.
    DuPont, H. L.
    Garey, K. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2010, 74 (04) : 309 - 318
  • [10] Automated Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Clinical Samples: Isothermal tcdB Amplification Coupled to Array-Based Detection
    Hicke, Brian
    Pasko, Chris
    Groves, Benjamin
    Ager, Edward
    Corpuz, Maylene
    Frech, Georges
    Munns, Denton
    Smith, Wendy
    Warcup, Ashley
    Denys, Gerald
    Ledeboer, Nathan A.
    Lindsey, Wes
    Owen, Charles
    Rea, Larry
    Jenison, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (08) : 2681 - 2687