Effects of high and fluctuating pressure on microbial abundance and activity in a water hydraulic system

被引:2
作者
Soini, SM
Koskinen, KT
Vilenius, MJ
Puhakka, JA
机构
[1] Inst Environm Engn & Biotechnol, Tampere, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Technol, Inst Hydraul & Automat, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00253-001-0929-9
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The effects of high and fluctuating pressure up to 220 bar on microbial growth and activity were determined in a pilot-scale water hydraulic system. An increase in the pipeline pressure from 70 to 220 bar decreased the total and the viable cell number in the pressure medium from 2.2(+/-0.5)x10(5) to 4.9(+/-1.5)x10(4) cells/ml and from 5.7(+/-2.8)x10(4) to 1.3(+/-0.7)x10(4) cfu/ml, respectively. Microbial attachment in the non-pressurised tank of the hydraulic system increased with increasing pipeline pressure [from 1.0(+/-0.3) to 3.8(+/-2.7)x10(5) cells/cm(2) on stainless steel]. The phosphatase. aminopeptidase and beta-glucosidase activities in the pressurised medium were between 0.02 and 1.4 mumol/lh (V-max) and decreased in response to increasing pipeline pressure. The alpha-glucosidase activity was detected only at 70 bar and the glucuronidase activity only occasionally. Based on principal component and cluster analyses, both the pressure applied and the original filling water quality affected ubstrate utilisation patterns. This study demonstrated the capability of freshwater bacteria to tolerate high and fluctuating pressure in a technical water system. Microbial survival was due to attachment and growth on the surfaces of the non-pressurised components and the nutrient flux released by cell lysis in the pressurised components. In summary, high pressures in water hydraulic systems do not prevent potential microbiologically related operational problems.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 674
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Benito A, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P1564
[2]   Comparison of two kinds of Biolog microplates (GN and ECO) in their ability to distinguish among aquatic microbial communities [J].
Choi, KH ;
Dobbs, FC .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 1999, 36 (03) :203-213
[3]  
CHROST RJ, 1991, BROCK SPR S, P29
[4]  
*FINN STAND ASS, 1997, SFSEN1484 FINN STAND
[5]   CLASSIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF HETEROTROPHIC MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES ON THE BASIS OF PATTERNS OF COMMUNITY-LEVEL SOLE-CARBON-SOURCE UTILIZATION [J].
GARLAND, JL ;
MILLS, AL .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 57 (08) :2351-2359
[6]   ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING THE ACCURACY, REPRODUCIBILITY, AND INTERPRETATION OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITY CARBON SOURCE UTILIZATION PATTERNS [J].
HAACK, SK ;
GARCHOW, H ;
KLUG, MJ ;
FORNEY, LJ .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 61 (04) :1458-1468
[7]   MICROBIAL DECOMPOSITION IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS - COMBINED PROCESS OF EXTRACELLULAR ENZYME-ACTIVITY AND SUBSTRATE UPTAKE [J].
HOPPE, HG ;
KIM, SJ ;
GOCKE, K .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1988, 54 (03) :784-790
[8]   The molecular biology of barophilic bacteria [J].
Kato, C ;
Bartlett, DH .
EXTREMOPHILES, 1997, 1 (03) :111-116
[9]  
Kato C, 1998, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V64, P1510
[10]   The use of carbon substrate utilization patterns in environmental and ecological microbiology [J].
Konopka, A ;
Oliver, L ;
Turco, RF .
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 1998, 35 (02) :103-115