Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment Focus on the Building Sector

被引:32
作者
Saunders, Christi L. [1 ]
Landis, Amy E. [1 ]
Mecca, Laurel P. [2 ]
Jones, Alex K. [1 ]
Schaefer, Laura A. [1 ]
Bilec, Melissa M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Univ Ctr Social & Urban Res, Qualitat Data Anal Program, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
architecture; engineering; and construction (AEC); buildings; focus groups; industrial ecology; life cycle assessment (LCA); sustainability; OCCUPANT TRAINING MATERIALS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; UNRESOLVED PROBLEMS; CHALLENGES; OFFICE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12028
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole-building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole-building LCA. In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self-identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was provides information about environmental impacts. The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building-related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 788
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M, DOI DOI 10.1002/JTR
[2]  
Baumann H., 2004, HITCH HIKERS GUIDE L
[3]   TECHNIQUES FOR ANALYZING FOCUS GROUP DATA [J].
BERTRAND, JT ;
BROWN, JE ;
WARD, VM .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1992, 16 (02) :198-209
[4]   Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes [J].
Bilec, Melissa ;
Ries, Robert ;
Matthews, H. Scott ;
Sharrard, Aurora L. .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2006, 12 (04) :207-215
[5]   Life-Cycle Assessment Modeling of Construction Processes for Buildings [J].
Bilec, Melissa M. ;
Ries, Robert J. ;
Matthews, H. Scott .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2010, 16 (03) :199-205
[6]  
British Standards Institution, 2012, SUST CONSTR WORKS EN
[7]  
Calderon J L, 2000, Educ Health (Abingdon), V13, P91
[8]   Comparison of Environmental Effects of Steel- and Concrete-Framed Buildings [J].
Guggemos, Angela Acree ;
Horvath, Arpad .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2005, 11 (02) :93-101
[9]  
Hauschild M., 1998, ENV ASSESSMENT PRODU
[10]  
Hofstetter P., 2003, J IND ECOL, V7, P79, DOI [10.1162/108819803322564361, DOI 10.1162/108819803322564361]