Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis

被引:313
作者
Dennis, AR [1 ]
Wixom, BH
Vandenberg, RJ
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Accounting & Informat Ssyt Dept, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, McIntire Sch Commerce, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Terry Coll Business, Dept Management, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
group support systems; GSS; groupware; meta-analysis; task technology fit; appropriation; adoption; structuration; contingency theory; collaboration;
D O I
10.2307/3250928
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Many previous papers have lamented the fact that the findings of past GSS research have been inconsistent. This paper develops a new model for interpreting GSS effects on performance (a Fit-Appropriation Model), which argues that GSS performance is affected by two factors. The first is the fit between the task and the GSS structures selected for use (i.e., communication support and information processing support). The second is the appropriation support the group receives in the form of training, facilitation, and software restrictiveness to help them effectively incorporate the selected GSS structures into their meeting process. A meta-analysis using this model to organize and classify past research found that when used appropriately (i.e., there is a fit between the GSS structures and the task, and the group receives appropriation support), GSS use increased the number of ideas generated, took less time, and led to more satisfied participants than if the group worked without the GSS. Fitting the GSS to the task had the most impact on outcome effectiveness (decision quality and ideas), while appropriation support had the most impact on the process (time required and process satisfaction). We conclude that when using this theoretical tens, the results of GSS research do not appear inconsistent.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 193
页数:27
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GROUP SUPPORT SYSTEM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, MANAGE COMMUN Q
[3]   AN EXPERIMENT ASSESSING GROUP SUPPORT SYSTEM AND FACILITATOR EFFECTS ON MEETING OUTCOMES [J].
ANSON, R ;
BOSTROM, R ;
WYNNE, B .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (02) :189-208
[4]   An experimental analysis of face to face versus computer mediated communication channels [J].
Barkhi, R ;
Jacob, VS ;
Pirkul, H .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 1999, 8 (04) :325-347
[5]  
BEAUCLAIR RA, 1989, J INFORM SCI, V15, P321, DOI 10.1177/016555158901500603
[6]   THE EFFECTS OF GROUP, TASK, CONTEXT, AND TECHNOLOGY VARIABLES ON THE USEFULNESS OF GROUP SUPPORT SYSTEMS - A METAANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES [J].
BENBASAT, I ;
LIM, LH .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1993, 24 (04) :430-462
[7]  
BENBASAT I, 1993, NATO ASI SERIES F, V101, P383
[8]  
BOSTROM RP, 1996, J TEACHING INT BUSIN, V7, P7
[9]  
BRIGGS RO, 1997, P 18 INT C INF SYST
[10]  
BUI T, 1990, P 23 HAW INT C SYST, V3, P554