Environmental inequity in England: Small area associations between socio-economic status and environmental pollution

被引:84
|
作者
Briggs, David [1 ]
Abellan, Juan J. [1 ]
Fecht, Daniela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London W2 1PG, England
关键词
Environmental equity; Environmental justice; Deprivation; Socio-economic status (SES); UK; Pollution;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.040
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Recent studies have suggested that more deprived people tend to live in areas characterised by higher levels of environmental pollution. If generally true, these environmental inequities may combine to cause adverse effects on health and also exacerbate problems of confounding in epidemiological studies. Previous studies of environmental inequity have nevertheless indicated considerable complexity in the associations involved, which merit further investigation using more detailed data and more advanced analytical methods. This study investigates the ways in which environmental inequity in England varies in relation to: (a) different environmental pollutants (measured in different ways); (b) different aspects of socio-economic status: and (c) different geographical scales and contexts (urban vs. rural). Associations were analysed between the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD2004) and its domains and five sets of environmental pollutants (relating to road traffic, industry, electro-magnetic frequency radiation, disinfection by-products in drinking water and radon), measured in terms of proximity, emission intensity and environmental concentration. Associations were assessed using bivariate and multivariate correlation, and by comparing the highest and lowest quintiles of deprivation using Student's t-test and Hotelling's T2. Associations are generally weak (R-2 < 0.10), and vary depending on the specific measures used. Strongest associations occur with what can be regarded as contingent components of deprivation (e.g. crime, living environment, health) rather than causative factors such as income, employment or education. Associations also become stronger with increasing level of spatial aggregation. Overall, the results suggest that any triple jeopardy for health, and problems of confounding, associated with environmental inequities are likely to be limited. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1612 / 1629
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The relationship between socio-economic indicators and air pollution in England and Wales: implications for environmental justice
    H. McLeod
    I. H. Langford
    A. P. Jones
    J. R. Stedman
    R. J. Day
    I. Lorenzoni
    I. J. Bateman
    Regional Environmental Change, 2000, 1 : 78 - 85
  • [2] The relationship between socio-economic indicators and air pollution in England and Wales: implications for environmental justice
    McLeod, H.
    Langford, I. H.
    Jones, A. P.
    Stedman, J. R.
    Day, R. J.
    Lorenzoni, I.
    Bateman, I. J.
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2000, 1 (02) : 78 - 85
  • [3] Development of an environmental justice index to determine socio-economic disparities of noise pollution and green space in residential areas in Berlin
    Lakes, Tobia
    Brueckner, Maria
    Kraemer, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 57 (04) : 538 - 556
  • [4] Representing Inequities in the Distribution of Socio-Economic Benefits and Environmental Risk
    Garric E. Louis
    Luna M. Magpili
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2002, 79 : 101 - 119
  • [5] Representing inequities in the distribution of socio-economic benefits and environmental risk
    Louis, GE
    Magpili, LM
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2002, 79 (02) : 101 - 119
  • [6] Associations between socio-economic status measures and functional change among older people in Taiwan
    Chiu, HC
    Hsieh, YH
    Mau, LW
    Lee, ML
    AGEING & SOCIETY, 2005, 25 : 377 - 395
  • [7] Editorial: Environmental and socio-economic drivers of migrant farmworkers' health
    Castillo, Federico
    Lopez-Carr, David
    Sanchez, Armando
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [8] Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: An ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors
    Cerin, Ester
    Leslie, Eva
    Owen, Neville
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2009, 68 (06) : 1013 - 1020
  • [9] Socio-economic factors influencing farmers' willingness to undertake environmental responsibility
    Lazaridou, D.
    Michailidis, A.
    Trigkas, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (15) : 14732 - 14741
  • [10] LET'S WORK TOGETHER: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN THE COURTS
    Dugard, Jackie
    Alcaro, Anna
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL ON HUMAN RIGHTS, 2013, 29 : 14 - 31