Dynamic multi-objective optimization applied to a solar-geothermal multi-generation system for hydrogen production, desalination, and energy storage

被引:60
作者
Sohani, Ali [1 ]
Delfani, Fatemeh [2 ]
Hosseini, Mohammadmehdi [1 ]
Sayyaadi, Hoseyn [1 ]
Karimi, Nader [3 ,4 ]
Li, Larry K. B. [5 ]
Doranehgard, Mohammad Hossein [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Lab Optimizat Thermal Syst Installat, Fac Mech Engn, Energy Div, POB 19395-1999,15-19 Pardis St,Mollasadra Ave,Van, Tehran 1999143344, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Semnan Branch, Semnan, Iran
[3] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Engn & Mat Sci, London E1 4NS, England
[4] Univ Glasgow, James Watt Sch Engn, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Alberta, Sch Min & Petr Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
关键词
Multi-effect desalination technology; Dynamic multi-objective optimization; Solar geothermal energies combination; Techno-economic analysis; Hydrogen production; DESIGN; ELECTROLYSIS; ELECTRICITY; RESOURCES; PLANT; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.253
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The design of optimal energy systems is vital to achieving global environmental and economic targets. In the design of solar-geothermal multi-generation systems, most pre-vious investigations have relied on the static multi-objective optimization approach (SMOA), which may leave considerable room for improvement under certain conditions. In this numerical study, the optimal condition at which to operate a solar-geothermal multi -generation system -which can simultaneously produce hydrogen, fresh water, electricity, and heat, along with storing energy -is determined via a dynamic multi-objective opti-mization approach (DMOA). Optimization is performed using a combination of NSGA-II and TOPSIS, and the results are benchmarked against those of SMOA. The decision variables include the solar area, geothermal water extraction mass flow, and hydrogen storage pressure. The objective functions include the production of electricity, heat, hydrogen, and fresh water, along with the exergy and energy efficiencies and the payback period. It is found that when compared with SMOA, DMOA can significantly improve all the objective functions. The annual production of electricity, heat, hydrogen, and fresh water increases by 14.4, 16.1, 13.5, and 14.3%, respectively, while the average annual exergy and energy efficiencies increase by 5.2 and 3.0%, respectively. The use of DMOA also reduces the payback period from 5.56 to 4.43 years, with a 4.4% reduction in hydrogen storage pressure. This shows that compared with a static approach such as SMOA, DMOA can improve the exergy and energy efficiencies, economic viability, and safety of a solar-geothermal multi -generation system. (c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31730 / 31741
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Optimal design of a grid-connected desalination plant powered by renewable energy resources using a hybrid PSO-GWO approach [J].
Abdelshafy, Alaaeldin M. ;
Hassan, Hamdy ;
Jurasz, Jakub .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 173 :331-347
[2]   Green hydrogen & electricity production via geothermal-driven multi-generation system: Thermodynamic modeling and optimization [J].
Alirahmi, Seyed Mojtaba ;
Assareh, Ehsanolah ;
Pourghassab, Nader Nadaki ;
Delpisheh, Mostafa ;
Barelli, Linda ;
Baldinelli, Arianna .
FUEL, 2022, 308
[3]   Multi-objective design optimization of a solar based system for electricity, cooling, and hydrogen production [J].
Behzadi, Amirmohammad ;
Habibollahzade, Ali ;
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Gholamian, Ehsan ;
Houshfar, Ehsan .
ENERGY, 2019, 169 :696-709
[4]   Hydrogen production using solar energy and injection into a solid oxide fuel cell for CO2 emission reduction; Thermoeconomic assessment and tri-objective optimization [J].
Cao, Yan ;
Dhahad, Hayder A. ;
ABo-Khalil, Ahmed G. ;
Sharma, Kamal ;
Mohammed, Adil Hussein ;
Anqi, Ali E. ;
El-Shafay, A. S. .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 50
[5]   Design and optimization of a combined solar thermophotovoltaic power generation and solid oxide electrolyser for hydrogen production [J].
Daneshpour, Raheleh ;
Mehrpooya, Mehdi .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 176 :274-286
[6]   Synergizing hydrogen and cement industries for Canada's climate plan - case study [J].
El-Emam, Rami S. ;
Gabriel, Kamiel S. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2021, 43 (23) :3151-3165
[7]   Multi-objective optimization of an experimental integrated thermochemical cycle of hydrogen production with an artificial neural network [J].
Farsi, Aida ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Naterer, Greg F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (46) :24355-24369
[8]   Hydrogen production by water electrolysis and off-grid solar PV [J].
Gutierrez-Martin, F. ;
Amodio, Lidia ;
Pagano, Maurizio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (57) :29038-29048
[9]   Multi-criteria optimization of an integrated energy system with thermoelectric generator, parabolic trough solar collector and electrolysis for hydrogen production [J].
Habibollahzade, Ali ;
Gholamian, Ehsan ;
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Behzadi, Amirmohammad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (31) :14140-14157
[10]  
Ibrahim Kaya, 2021, UTIL ENV EFF, P1