Corneal Deformation Measurement Using Scheimpflug Noncontact Tonometry

被引:238
作者
Hon, Ying [1 ]
Lam, Andrew K. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Optometry, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
noncontact tonometry; repeatability; reproducibility; corneal deformation amplitude; corneal biomechanics; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; STATISTICAL-METHODS; AIR-PUFF; REPEATABILITY; THICKNESS; HYSTERESIS; AGREEMENT; APPLANATION;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0b013e318279eb87
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To determine the intraexaminer repeatability and intersession reproducibility of corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry (Corvis ST) on normal subjects. Methods. Thirty-seven adults aged 20 to 48 years were invited to have their corneal deformation and curvature measurements taken using Corvis ST and Pentacam, respectively. Three consecutive measurements were taken for each instrument between 9:00 and 11:00 AM for intraexaminer repeatability analysis. Participants returned between 3:00 and 5:00 PM the same day for intersession reproducibility analysis. Results. The most repeatable corneal parameter measured by Corvis ST was central corneal thickness ([CCT] ICC, 0.96; precision, 10.85 mu m; repeatability, 15.34 mu m; CV, 1.01%), followed by deformation amplitude ([DA] ICC, 0.80; precision, 0.08 mm; repeatability, 0.13 mm; CV, 4.33%), first applanation time ([1st A-time] ICC, 0.77; precision, 0.22 milliseconds; repeatability, 0.31 milliseconds; CV, 1.42), and intraocular pressure ([IOP] ICC, 0.75; precision, 1.39 mm Hg; repeatability, 1.97 mm Hg; CV, 4.98). Other parameters showed poor repeatability. The DA and 1st A-time showed good intersession reproducibility. The 95% limits of agreement were +0.13 to (-)0.13 mm for DA and +0.27 to (-)0.33 milliseconds for 1st A-time. The DA was negatively correlated with central corneal thickness (r = (-)0.53, p < 0.001) but not with corneal curvatures (flattest curvature, r = 0.13, p = 0.46; steepest curvature, r = 0.05, p = 0.75). Conclusions. Corneal deformation parameters DA and 1st A-time were repeatable and reproducible. A thinner cornea was associated with a higher corneal deformation. Measurement of DA serves as an indicator of corneal biomechanical properties. (Optom Vis Sci 2013;90:e1-e8)
引用
收藏
页码:E1 / E8
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The effect of repeated applanation on subsequent IOP measurements [J].
AlMubrad, Turki M. ;
Ogbuehi, Kelechi C. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2008, 91 (06) :524-529
[2]   Assessment of corneal dynamics with high-speed swept source Optical Coherence Tomography combined with an air puff system [J].
Alonso-Caneiro, David ;
Karnowski, Karol ;
Kaluzny, Bartlomiej J. ;
Kowalczyk, Andrzej ;
Wojtkowski, Maciej .
OPTICS EXPRESS, 2011, 19 (15) :14188-14199
[3]  
Ambrosio Jr R., 2011, ASCRSASOA SAN DIEG C
[4]  
Ambrosio Renato Jr, 2011, Int Ophthalmol Clin, V51, P11, DOI 10.1097/IIO.0b013e31820f1d2d
[5]   Corneal Hysteresis and Visual Field Asymmetry in Open Angle Glaucoma [J].
Anand, Aashish ;
De Moraes, Carlos Gustavo V. ;
Teng, Christopher C. ;
Tello, Celso ;
Liebmann, Jeffrey M. ;
Ritch, Robert .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (12) :6514-6518
[6]   The elasticity and rigidity of the outer coats of the eye [J].
Asejczyk-Widlicka, M. ;
Pierscionek, B. K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 92 (10) :1415-1418
[7]   Measurement error [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7047) :1654-1654
[8]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[9]   Full-field deformation of bovine cornea under constrained inflation conditions [J].
Boyce, Brad L. ;
Grazier, J. Mark ;
Jones, Reese E. ;
Nguyen, Thao D. .
BIOMATERIALS, 2008, 29 (28) :3896-3904
[10]   Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer [J].
Cho, P ;
Lui, T .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1997, 74 (01) :51-58