Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of multi-span highway bridges

被引:22
作者
Bayat, M. [1 ]
Daneshjoo, F. [1 ]
Nistico, N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Struct & Geotech Engn, I-00185 Rome, Italy
关键词
highway bridge; fragility curve; nonlinear time history analysis; finite element modeling; SEISMIC FRAGILITY; CURVES; EARTHQUAKE; RISK;
D O I
10.12989/scs.2015.19.1.237
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this study, we try to compare different intensity measures for evaluating nonlinear response of bridge structure. This paper presents seismic analytic fragility of a three-span concrete girder highway bridge. A complete detail of bridge modeling parameters and also its verification has been presented. Fragility function considers the relationship of intensities of the ground motion and probability of exceeding certain state of damage. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) has been subjected to the bridge from medium to strong ground motions. A suite of 20 earthquake ground motions with different range of PGAs are used in nonlinear dynamic analysis of the bridge. Complete sensitive analyses have been done on the response of bridge and also efficiency and practically of them are studied to obtain a proficient intensity measure for these types of structure by considering its sensitivity to the period of the bridge. Three dimensional finite element (FE) model of the bridge is developed and analyzed. The numerical results show that the bridge response is very sensitive to the earthquake ground motions when PGA and Sa (Ti, 5%) are used as intensity measure (IM) and also indicated that the failure probability of the bridge system is dominated by the bridge piers.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 262
页数:26
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Agency F. E.M, 2009, P695 FEMA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, HAZUS MH MR1 TECHN M
[3]   Mechanistic quantification of RC bridge damage states under earthquake through fragility analysis [J].
Banerjee, Swagata ;
Shinozuka, Masanobu .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2008, 23 (01) :12-22
[4]  
Basoz N.I., 1998, EVALUATION BRIDGE DA
[5]  
Choi E., 2002, THESIS GEORGIA I TEC
[6]   Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience [J].
Cimellaro, Gian Paolo ;
Reinhorn, Andrei M. ;
Bruneau, Michel .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (11) :3639-3649
[7]   Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines [J].
Cornell, CA ;
Jalayer, F ;
Hamburger, RO ;
Foutch, DA .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (04) :526-533
[8]   Seismic vulnerability of skew bridges under bi-directional ground motions [J].
Deepu, S. P. ;
Prajapat, Kanta ;
Ray-Chaudhuri, Samit .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 71 :150-160
[9]   An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions [J].
Eads, Laura ;
Miranda, Eduardo ;
Krawinkler, Helmut ;
Lignos, Dimitrios G. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2013, 42 (01) :25-41
[10]  
Hwang H., 2001, TECHNICAL REPORT