Time for Better Access to High-Quality Abortion Data in the United States

被引:11
作者
Ahrens, Katherine A. [1 ]
Hutcheon, Jennifer A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Maine, Muskie Sch Publ Serv, Publ Hlth Program, Portland, ME USA
[2] Univ Vancouver British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
abortion; induced termination of pregnancy; perinatal health; pregnancy termination; LIST-EXPERIMENT; RACIAL DISPARITIES; PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; MEDICAL ABORTION; DISEASE-CONTROL; HEALTH; MORTALITY; BIRTH; EPIDEMIOLOGY; REANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwaa048
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Despite considerable lay attention on the regulation and legislation of abortion in the United States, important gaps remain in our understanding of its incidence and health and social consequences since its legalization in 1973. Many of these gaps in knowledge can be attributed to a lack of access to high-quality, individual-level abortion data over the past 46 years. Herein, we review the strengths and limitations of different, currently available methods for enumerating abortions in the United States and discuss how lack of access to high-quality data limits our surveillance and research activities of not only abortion but other important reproductive and perinatal health outcomes. We conclude by discussing some potential opportunities for improved access to high-quality abortion data in the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 647
页数:8
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Second international symposium on successive pregnancy outcomes: a decade of progress [J].
Ananth, Cande V. .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 21 :1-3
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Restricting insurance coverage of abortion, State Laws and Policies (as of May 2019)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, FAMILY PLANNING
[4]   Quantifying the impact of targeted regulation of abortion provider laws on US abortion rates: a multi-state assessment [J].
Austin, Nichole ;
Harper, Sam .
CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 100 (05) :374-379
[5]   Can a List Experiment Improve Validity of Abortion Measurement? [J].
Bell, Suzanne O. ;
Bishai, David .
STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 2019, 50 (01) :43-61
[6]   Five-Year Suicidal Ideation Trajectories Among Women Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion [J].
Biggs, M. Antonia ;
Gould, Heather ;
Barar, Rana E. ;
Foster, Diana G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 175 (09) :845-852
[7]   Women's Mental Health and Well-being 5 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study [J].
Biggs, M. Antonia ;
Upadhyay, Ushma D. ;
McCulloch, Charles E. ;
Foster, Diana G. .
JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 74 (02) :169-178
[8]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NAT ART SURV
[9]   Enacted abortion stigma in the United States [J].
Cowan, Sarah K. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 177 :259-268
[10]   Alternative Estimates of Lifetime Prevalence Of Abortion from Indirect Survey Questioning Methods [J].
Cowan, Sarah K. ;
Wu, Lawrence L. ;
Makela, Susanna ;
England, Paula .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2016, 48 (04) :229-234