A study to determine the differences between the displayed dose values for two full-field digital mammography units and values calculated using a range of Monte-Carlo-based techniques: a phantom study

被引:12
作者
Borg, M. [1 ]
Badr, I. [2 ]
Royle, G. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mater Dei Hosp, Med Imaging Dept, Msida, Malta
[2] St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust, Radiol Protect Ctr, London SW17 0QT, England
[3] UCL, Dept Med Phys & Bioengn, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncs167
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Modern full-field digital mammography (FFDM) units display the mean glandular dose (MGD) and the entrance or incident air kerma (K) to the breast following each exposure. Information on how these values are calculated is limited and knowing how displayed MGD values compare and correlate to conventional Monte-Carlo-based methods is useful. From measurements done on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms, it has been shown that displayed and calculated MGD values are similar for thin to medium thicknesses and appear to differ with larger PMMA thicknesses. As a result, a multiple linear regression analysis on the data was performed to generate models by which displayed MGD values on the two FFDM units included in the study may be converted to the Monte-Carlo values calculated by conventional methods. These models should be a useful tool for medical physicists requiring MGD data from FFDM units included in this paper and should reduce the survey time spent on dose calculations.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 228
页数:12
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment [J].
Boone, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) :23-37
[2]   Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary x-ray spectra in mammography: Computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data [J].
Boone, JM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) :869-875
[3]   Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study [J].
Dance, DR ;
Klang, AT ;
Sandborg, M ;
Skinner, CL ;
Smith, IAC ;
Carlsson, GA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (874) :1056-1067
[4]   Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol [J].
Dance, DR ;
Skinner, CL ;
Young, KC ;
Beckett, JR ;
Kotre, CJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (11) :3225-3240
[5]   FORWARD-SCATTERED RADIATION FROM THE COMPRESSION PADDLE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN GLANDULAR DOSE ESTIMATIONS [J].
Hemdal, Bengt .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2011, 147 (1-2) :196-201
[6]   Backscatter factors for mammography calculated with Monte Carlo methods [J].
Kramer, R ;
Drexler, G ;
Petoussi-Henss, N ;
Zankl, M ;
Regulla, D ;
Panzer, W .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (03) :771-781
[7]  
Petrie A., 2000, MED STAT GLANCE
[8]  
Radcal, 2009, ACCU FAM INSTR ACCU
[9]   A parametric method for determining mammographic X-ray tube output and half value layer [J].
Robson, KJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2001, 74 (880) :335-340
[10]   Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables [J].
Sobol, WT ;
Wu, XZ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (04) :547-554