Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles

被引:27
|
作者
De Vos, Anick [1 ]
Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel [1 ]
Van Landuyt, Lisbet [1 ]
Van de Velde, Hilde [1 ]
Tournaye, Herman [1 ]
Verheyen, Greta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, Ctr Reprod Med, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
cleavage-stage transfer; blastocyst transfer; birthweight; vitrification; neonatal outcome; IN-VITRO CULTURE; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; NEONATAL OUTCOMES; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; EXTENDED CULTURE; INCREASED RISK; PRETERM BIRTH; CRYOPRESERVATION; VITRIFICATION; PREGNANCIES;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dex361
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY QUESTION: Does extended culture to the blastocyst stage affect singleton birthweight after either fresh or vitrified-warmed embryo transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Singleton birthweight z-scores did not vary significantly after a fresh blastocyst transfer, whereas the additional effect of vitrification remains inconclusive. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Observational studies have associated extended culture with an increased risk of preterm birth and low birthweight. On the contrary, in terms of birthweight and gestational age, singletons born after vitrification have been associated with a better perinatal outcome when compared to those born following a fresh transfer. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Our post-hoc cohort analysis on neonatal outcomes included 447 liveborn singletons was derived from a recent retrospective analysis on cumulative live birth rates after cleavage-stage and blastocyst transfers. These babies were born following a fresh single cleavage-stage transfer (FCT Day 3, n = 113), fresh single blastocyst transfer (FBT Day 5, n = 218), vitrified-warmed cleavage-stage transfer (VCT Day 3, n = 58) or vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (VBT Day 5, n = 58). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Singleton birthweight was the primary outcome measure. Gestational age and gender of the newborn were accounted for by using birthweight z-scores in a multivariable linear regression analysis, adjusting for other confounders (maternal age, BMI, parity and smoking behaviour). Vanishing twins were excluded from the analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A significantly lower z-score was observed after blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer in the vitrified-warmed Day 5 group (P = 0.013), a difference not observed in the fresh transfer groups (P = 0.32). Following multivariable regression analysis [adjusted regression coefficient (95% confidence interval)], the FCT and FBT groups showed no significant influence on the birthweight z-scores after fresh transfer [-0.19 (-0.44; 0.05)], but the transfer of vitrified blastocysts (VBT) was associated with a lower birthweight [-0.52 (-0.90; -0.15)] compared with the transfer of vitrified cleavage-stage embryos (VCT). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The present cohort was relatively small, especially in the vitrified-warmed subgroups. Pregnancy-associated factors possibly influencing birthweight (such as diabetes, hypertension, pre-eclampsia) were also not accounted for in the analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Different ART procedures, including extended culture and vitrification, may hold potential safety issues. These results require further confirmation in future larger studies.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 201
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perinatal outcomes of singletons born after blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer in FET cycles
    Xie, Qijun
    Jiang, Wei
    Ji, Hui
    Li, Xin
    Zhou, Yuxi
    Zhao, Chun
    Zhang, Junqiang
    Lu, Jing
    Ling, Xiufeng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 271 : 265 - 270
  • [2] Birthweight of singletons born after blastocyst-stage or cleavage-stage transfer: analysis of a data set from three randomized controlled trials
    De Vos, Anick
    dos Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
    Tournaye, Herman
    Verheyen, Greta
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2020, 37 (01) : 127 - 132
  • [3] Birthweight of singletons born after blastocyst-stage or cleavage-stage transfer: analysis of a data set from three randomized controlled trials
    Anick De Vos
    Samuel dos Santos-Ribeiro
    Herman Tournaye
    Greta Verheyen
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2020, 37 : 127 - 132
  • [4] Blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer?
    Johnson, Neil
    Blake, Debbie
    Farquhar, Cindy
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [5] Effect of embryo and blastocyst transfer on the birthweight of live-born singletons from FET cycles
    Fang, Junshun
    Zhu, Lihua
    Li, Dong
    Xu, Zhipeng
    Yan, Guijun
    Sun, Haixiang
    Zhang, Ningyuan
    Chen, Linjun
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2018, 35 (10) : 1905 - 1910
  • [6] Effect of embryo and blastocyst transfer on the birthweight of live-born singletons from FET cycles
    Junshun Fang
    Lihua Zhu
    Dong Li
    Zhipeng Xu
    Guijun Yan
    Haixiang Sun
    Ningyuan Zhang
    Linjun Chen
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2018, 35 : 1905 - 1910
  • [7] Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms?
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Farquhar, Cynthia
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (02) : 244 - 250
  • [8] The risk of birth defects among children born after vitrified blastocyst transfers and those born after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage embryo transfers
    Zhu, Qianqian
    Wang, Ningling
    Wang, Bian
    Wang, Yun
    Kuang, Yanping
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (04) : 833 - 840
  • [9] The risk of birth defects among children born after vitrified blastocyst transfers and those born after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage embryo transfers
    Qianqian Zhu
    Ningling Wang
    Bian Wang
    Yun Wang
    Yanping Kuang
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 298 : 833 - 840
  • [10] Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer
    Milki, AA
    Jun, SH
    Hinckley, MD
    Behr, B
    Giudice, LC
    Westphal, LM
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (03) : 503 - 506