Quantum tomography enhanced through parametric amplification

被引:23
作者
Knyazev, E. [1 ]
Spasibko, K. Yu [2 ,3 ]
Chekhova, M. V. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Khalili, F. Ya [4 ]
机构
[1] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Fac Phys, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] Max Planck Inst Sci Light, Staudtstr 2, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen, Staudtstr 7-B2, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[4] Russian Quantum Ctr, Skolkovo 143025, Russia
关键词
quantum tomography; optical losses; non-classical light; Wigner function; QUASI-PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; ATOMIC ENSEMBLES; STATE; LIGHT; INTERFEROMETERS; OPTOMECHANICS; VACUUM; OPTICS; PHASE;
D O I
10.1088/1367-2630/aa99b4
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Quantum tomography is the standard method of reconstructing the Wigner function of quantum states of light by means of balanced homodyne detection. The reconstruction quality strongly depends on the photodetectors quantum efficiency and other losses in the measurement setup. In this article we analyze in detail a protocol of enhanced quantum tomography, proposed by Leonhardt and Paul [1] which allows one to reduce the degrading effect of detection losses. It is based on phase-sensitive parametric amplification, with the phase of the amplified quadrature being scanned synchronously with the local oscillator phase. Although with sufficiently strong amplification the protocol enables overcoming any detection inefficiency, it was so far not implemented in the experiment, probably due to the losses in the amplifier. Here we discuss a possible proof-of-principle experiment with a traveling-wave parametric amplifier. We show that with the state-of-the-art optical elements, the protocol enables high fidelity tomographic reconstruction of bright non-classical states of light. We consider two examples: bright squeezed vacuum and squeezed single-photon state, with the latter being a non-Gaussian state and both strongly affected by the losses.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Abadie J, 2011, NAT PHYS, V7, P962, DOI [10.1038/NPHYS2083, 10.1038/nphys2083]
[2]  
Andersen UL, 2015, NAT PHYS, V11, P713, DOI [10.1038/nphys3410, 10.1038/NPHYS3410]
[3]  
[Anonymous], PHYS REV
[4]   Cavity optomechanics [J].
Aspelmeyer, Markus ;
Kippenberg, Tobias J. ;
Marquardt, Florian .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2014, 86 (04) :1391-1452
[5]   QUANTUM-MECHANICAL NOISE IN AN INTERFEROMETER [J].
CAVES, CM .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1981, 23 (08) :1693-1708
[6]   Nonlinear interferometers in quantum optics [J].
Chekhova, M. V. ;
Ou, Z. Y. .
ADVANCES IN OPTICS AND PHOTONICS, 2016, 8 (01) :104-155
[7]   Quantum Measurement Theory in Gravitational-Wave Detectors [J].
Danilishin, Stefan L. ;
Khalili, Farid Ya. .
LIVING REVIEWS IN RELATIVITY, 2012, 15
[8]  
Dmitriev V. G., 1999, Handbook of Nonlinear Optical Crystals, V64
[9]   Quantum cryptography [J].
Gisin, N ;
Ribordy, GG ;
Tittel, W ;
Zbinden, H .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2002, 74 (01) :145-195
[10]   Quantum interface between light and atomic ensembles [J].
Hammerer, Klemens ;
Sorensen, Anders S. ;
Polzik, Eugene S. .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2010, 82 (02) :1041-1093